Here is what "Israel has a right to defend itself" actually means in practice:
https://x.com/nxt888/status/2108652825073066086
Here is what "Israel has a right to defend itself" actually means in practice:
It means that the premise of the action is accepted before the action is examined.
It means the question is never: does this specific operation meet the legal standard of proportionality?
It means the question is always: how do we support Israel’s right to defend itself while expressing concern?
The "concern" is the vocabulary of people who have already decided the conclusion.
The conclusion being: whatever happened, "the right to exist" as a concept covers it.
Rights don’t work that way.
The right to self-defense in international law is not a blank check.
It has definitions.
Proportionality.
Distinction.
Necessity.
Those definitions exist because "the right to defend yourself," handed to any state unconditionally, isn’t a right.
It’s an exemption.
