Sunday, 8 November 2026

"The BBC is the most refined propaganda service in the world.

 https://x.com/ionank/status/2118949658680586443

Frank O'Callaghan
What is the point of having BOTH an israeli embassy AND the BBC? Both are run by the same people. & They both do the same job: They both tell lies to enable mass-murder of Palestinian children & steal holiday homes for American & East European migrants!

https://x.com/ionank/status/2118949658680586443

Strong pro-Israel bias among BBC bosses.

 https://x.com/declassifiedUK/status/2118724214475902997

Declassified UK
Strong pro-Israel bias among BBC bosses. BBC executives met nine times with pro-Israel Jewish groups and just once with pro-Palestinians in first 14 months of genocide👇

https://x.com/declassifiedUK/status/2118724214475902997

AI Images Have a Real Environmental Footprint—Even When the Worlds They Show Are Fake

 Real Talk Podcast

 
Follow

 
AI Images Have a Real Environmental Footprint—Even When the Worlds They Show Are Fake



An AI-generated cartoon may be imaginary, but the electricity behind it is real. Generating images requires computing hardware, and the data centers running that hardware consume power and may use water for cooling. The International Energy Agency estimates that all data centers used about 485 terawatt-hours of electricity globally in 2025, with demand projected to roughly double by 2030. Those totals include many services beyond generative AI. Berkeley Lab also estimated that U.S. data centers directly consumed approximately 66 billion liters of water in 2023. An individual image’s footprint varies with the model, hardware, electricity supply, and cooling system. That makes efficiency and transparent reporting essential—and raises a reasonable question: how much resource-intensive digital content is actually improving our lives?
(Sources: International Energy Agency; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory)


This morning I searched "genocide" on the BBC News app. Not a single article on Gaza in the results shown below.

 https://x.com/JonWiltshire_/status/2119320588036575698

This morning I searched "genocide" on the BBC News app. Not a single article on Gaza in the results shown below. And if you think we're just talking about perceived bias towards Israel, consider this: – resigned over Gaza coverage, exposing serious editorial failures. – BBC North Africa correspondent who resigned, citing his professional conscience. 111 BBC journalists – anonymously backed an open letter condemning the corporation's Gaza coverage and editorial decisions. 400+ media figures, including Miriam Margolyes, Alexei Sayle and Mike Leigh, demanded the removal of BBC board member Robbie Gibb over impartiality concerns. Ramita Navai and – publicly condemned the BBC for shelving Gaza: Doctors Under Attack, subsequently broadcast by Channel 4. Akinola Davies Jr – had his words "Free Palestine" edited out of the BBC's BAFTA broadcast. And in recent weeks, we've seen even more extraordinary examples. 's hostile interrogation of over the Green Party's Zionism motion, repeatedly challenging his position while he attempted to bring the discussion back to the suffering of Palestinians. interrupting as he condemned Israel's extremist government, stepping in to remind him that Israel would deny being extremist. It's fucking endless. The BBC continues to suppress language that accurately describes Israel's actions, stifles critical commentary, and amplifies Israeli officials and pro-Israel commentators, while Palestinian voices are marginalised or silenced altogether. Those defending Israel are given a microphone. Those challenging its actions face hostile interrogation. At what point do we stop calling this perceived bias and start demanding serious institutional complicty in war crimes? Who holds the BBC accountable when the institution tasked with scrutinising power is itself protecting it? #GazaGenocide #FreePalestine

https://x.com/JonWiltshire_/status/2119320588036575698