What you are actually saying is: "Either accept genocide, or accept your own permanent subordination. Those are the only options I recognize."
https://x.com/nxt888/status/2013313666423365961
You just did something very revealing.
You framed "peace" as a choice between:
1. Killing millions of Jews and Muslims and "destroying Israel from the river to the sea", or
2. Palestinians surrendering, stopping all resistance, and recognizing Israel exactly as it is.
Then you called that "simple."
What you are actually saying is:
"Either accept genocide, or accept your own permanent subordination. Those are the only options I recognize."
And you are projecting that logic onto me.
Let me be very clear:
I do not support killing millions of Jews.
I do not support killing millions of Muslims.
I do not support mass slaughter of anyone.
What I reject is the way you smuggle genocide into the conversation as if it is the natural twin of Palestinian freedom.
There is a third option you carefully leave out because it terrifies you:
One land, from the river to the sea where everyone who lives there has equal rights.
No second-class status.
No siege.
No expulsions.
No refugee camps frozen in time for 70+ years.
No "Jewish supremacy."
No "Arab supremacy."
Just a political order where nobody’s "right to exist" depends on someone else’s dispossession.
You pretend that if Israel loses its ethnocratic structure, Jews will be "destroyed."
That is the psychological core of Zionism: equating the end of apartheid with the end of Jewish life.
It is the same logic the white settler class in South Africa used about apartheid, the French colonists used about Algeria, and the Rhodesian regime used to justify its existence.
"We either rule or we die."
That is not a description of reality.
That is the threat structure of a guilty conscience.
You ask: "What is solution for peace now?"
Here is a real answer:
End the siege.
End the occupation.
End the system of laws that gives one group full rights and the other group checkpoints, permits, and demolitions.
Let refugees return or be justly compensated.
Build one political framework where Jews and Palestinians are citizens, not masters and subjects.
Will that be easy? No.
Will there be pain, fear, mistrust? Of course.
But that is what actual peace looks like:
Everyone loses the fantasy of ethnic domination,
Everyone gains the reality of equal humanity.
You reduce all of that to two cartoons:
"Kill them all" versus "submit and recognize."
That is not a peace plan.
That is an abuser asking whether the victim prefers a punch or a chokehold.
You say, "I know which one you pick."
You do not.
What I pick is very simple:
I pick a world where Jews are safe without walls, drones, and permanent military rule over another people.
I pick a world where Palestinians return home without having to erase anyone else’s existence to do it.
I pick an end to the system that tells both sides they must either dominate or be annihilated.
You can keep pretending that the only alternatives are genocide or Palestinian surrender.
But that is just you admitting you cannot imagine peace without Palestinian defeat.
And that tells me a lot more about your limits than it does about what is possible between the river and the sea.
posted by Satish Sharma at
01:47
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home