Strange because the youth female literacy rate in Iran last year was 98.9% and 70% of STEM university graduates are women. But bombing them back to the stone age will liberate them and provide equal education opportunities?
https://x.com/chronicalihere/status/2011116415978283475
Strange because the youth female literacy rate in Iran last year was 98.9% and 70% of STEM university graduates are women. But bombing them back to the stone age will liberate them and provide equal education opportunities?
Isn't it peculiar? Venezuela led economic growth statistics in Latin America last year, but it needs to be bombed and subject to regime change and aggressive resource extraction, to economically help the people there.
Whenever it comes to implemeting regime change against a foreign state, the popular narrative always makes it seem like sanctions or bombing them is solely about targeting/ harming a singular *evil* individual— a Saddam, Castro, Maduro or Ayatollah— hence legitimizing it as a means.
They never say outright that they're targeting or harming the Iraqi, Cuban or Iranian people— the actual citizenry of those countries who bear the brunt of that economic and imperialist warfare. That they're the one's being punished. Even when its claimed those actions are for their benefit. You think things are bad now? Wait until America's brought you freedom and democracy.
This rhetoric plays a pivotal role in reinforcing the necessity for these imperialist policies.
posted by Satish Sharma at
05:59
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home