Here is what is going to happen in Iran 🇮🇷 U.S. proudly published this roadmap years ago in a Brookings Institution paper titled “Which Path to Persia?”
https://x.com/ThePollLady/status/2011138378108916038
Here is what is going to happen in Iran 
U.S. proudly published this roadmap years ago in a Brookings Institution paper titled “Which Path to Persia?”
The paper begins with strategy of starving Iran into submission. The paper explicitly discusses the use of “harsh sanctions” and secondary sanctions on countries trading with Iran as part of a so-called “persuasion” strategy designed to cause “real pain in Tehran.” Crucially, this approach is predicated on the assumption that if the Iranian people are “threatened with the ruin of their economy, they will do anything to prevent it.”
Consequently, the paper moves on to analyzing methods for “inspiring an insurgency.” It openly acknowledges that the U.S. could engage Iran through “unconventional warfare” and terrorism by backing groups such as the Kurds to pressure or overthrow the current government.
Following this, the paper suggests that a performative show of “diplomacy” may be necessary before pursuing a military option. The purpose is to build international and domestic support by creating the narrative that Iran rejected a “very good deal.”
Most strikingly, the paper states that efforts to promote regime change might be “intended by the U.S. government as deliberate provocations to try to goad the Iranians into an excessive response that might then justify an American invasion.”
We are now at the last stage.
Throughout the document, they repeatedly admit that International public deception is required to manufacture consent for regime change, and that the opposition groups they support are neither popular nor viable without continuous U.S. backing.
U.S. proudly published this roadmap years ago in a Brookings Institution paper titled “Which Path to Persia?”
The paper begins with strategy of starving Iran into submission. The paper explicitly discusses the use of “harsh sanctions” and secondary sanctions on countries trading with Iran as part of a so-called “persuasion” strategy designed to cause “real pain in Tehran.” Crucially, this approach is predicated on the assumption that if the Iranian people are “threatened with the ruin of their economy, they will do anything to prevent it.”
Consequently, the paper moves on to analyzing methods for “inspiring an insurgency.” It openly acknowledges that the U.S. could engage Iran through “unconventional warfare” and terrorism by backing groups such as the Kurds to pressure or overthrow the current government.
Following this, the paper suggests that a performative show of “diplomacy” may be necessary before pursuing a military option. The purpose is to build international and domestic support by creating the narrative that Iran rejected a “very good deal.”
Most strikingly, the paper states that efforts to promote regime change might be “intended by the U.S. government as deliberate provocations to try to goad the Iranians into an excessive response that might then justify an American invasion.”
We are now at the last stage.
Throughout the document, they repeatedly admit that International public deception is required to manufacture consent for regime change, and that the opposition groups they support are neither popular nor viable without continuous U.S. backing.
posted by Satish Sharma at
05:51
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home