๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ซ ๐๐๐๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐๐ซ๐๐ง
https://x.com/ibrahimtmajed/status/2015807822068375872
๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ซ ๐๐๐๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐๐ซ๐๐ง
Since late 2023, tensions between Iran, Israel, and the United States have entered a phase governed by a new geometry of material power.
Despite constant speculation about a direct strike on Tehran, history, military doctrine, and political risk all converge on a single conclusion: such a move is unlikely to be the opening act.
If escalation expands, it will materialize first across the distributed fronts of Lebanon, Iraq, and Yemen.
This is not hesitation, it is design. Iranโs power is not territorial in the classical sense; it is a socio-technical system.
Any war directed at the center automatically metastasizes into a multi-front, systemic conflict across the periphery.
๐๐ซ๐๐งโ๐ฌ ๐๐๐ ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ซ๐๐ก๐ข๐ญ๐๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐
Iran has constructed influence through alignment rather than occupation.
Its regional partners function as technical actors, not proxies, integrated into a shared operational logic that combines precision-guided munitions, autonomous systems, intelligence fusion, and localized command structures.
This architecture produces three decisive effects:
- Decentralized Technical Agency: Allied forces retain independent decision-making capacity while operating within a shared strategic horizon.
- Erosion of Air Superiority: Dispersed launch platforms, layered defenses, and mobile systems negate traditional dominance doctrines.
- Social Embeddedness: These actors are rooted in local societies, rendering isolation or decapitation strategies structurally ineffective.
What emerges is not an alliance chain, but a resilient network, one that converts geography, population, and technology into strategic depth.
๐๐๐๐๐ง๐จ๐ง: ๐๐จ๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐๐ข๐ ๐ง๐ญ๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ โ๐๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ฑ๐๐๐ฉ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐งโ
Lebanon constitutes the most volatile front. Here, pressure has shifted from kinetic warfare to material dispossession, currency collapse, banking restrictions, and financial siege designed to fracture the resistance environment from within.
Yet this strategy misreads the terrain.
The resistance operates through a deeply internalized habitus, a social structure where sacrifice, endurance, and collective memory generate symbolic capital immune to economic coercion.
Within this framework, the resistance exists in a permanent State of Exception, exercising a form of sovereignty parallel to, and more resilient than, the formal state.
Any attempt to force a confrontation between this actor and the national army risks total institutional implosion.
In material terms, the network will always outlast the institution.
๐๐ซ๐๐ช: ๐๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ฎ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ข๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ญ๐๐ญ๐
In Iraq, the boundary between external influence and internal sovereignty has collapsed.
Allied forces are embedded within the security apparatus, economic infrastructure, and political process itself.
โIsolationโ would require dismantling the Iraqi state, an act the West neither desires nor can manage.
The re-emergence of assertive political configurations in Baghdad restores a contiguous logistical axis linking Iran to the Levant.
The strategic dilemma is absolute: normalize this reality or trigger a vacuum that will be filled by forces far less controllable.
๐๐๐ฆ๐๐ง: ๐๐ก๐๐ซ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐๐ซ ๐๐๐๐ญ๐ฌ ๐๐ฅ๐จ๐๐๐ฅ ๐๐ซ๐๐๐
Yemen is where asymmetry becomes global.
By exploiting geographic chokepoints and low-cost strike capabilities, it has transformed maritime commerce into a pressure lever against the international system itself.
This is not a peripheral theater.
It is a friction node where a materially inferior actor imposes disproportionate economic costs on global powers, demonstrating that control of flows can rival control of territory.
๐๐ก๐ ๐๐จ๐ ๐ข๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ โ๐๐๐ฏ๐๐ง๐ ๐ ๐๐จ๐๐๐๐ข๐๐ข๐๐ง๐ญโ
Western strategy assumes escalation can be managed through calibrated attrition.
This assumption is flawed. While one side calculates cost, the other operates under a Sovereign Doctrine rooted in existential survival.
Here enters the decisive variable: the Revenge Coefficient.
When symbolic thresholds are crossed, through high-level assassinations or violations of sacred political centers, the logic shifts.
Deterrence collapses into Strategic Revenge.
From a materialist lens, this appears irrational.
Within the moral economy of the region, it is compulsory.
๐ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ข๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ
If confrontation with Iran expands, it will not begin in Tehran.
It will unfold along Lebanonโs internal fault lines, inside Iraqโs institutions, and across Yemenโs maritime corridors.
The war is no longer a future scenario, it is a distributed condition.
The center cannot be struck until the socio-technical networks and sovereign logics of the periphery are dismantled. Current conditions suggest this is unachievable without total regional rupture.
In this war, the periphery is the battlefield, and the battlefield is already alive.
๐๐ซ๐๐งโ๐ฌ ๐๐๐ ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ซ๐๐ก๐ข๐ญ๐๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐
Iran has constructed influence through alignment rather than occupation.
Its regional partners function as technical actors, not proxies, integrated into a shared operational logic that combines precision-guided munitions, autonomous systems, intelligence fusion, and localized command structures.
This architecture produces three decisive effects:
- Decentralized Technical Agency: Allied forces retain independent decision-making capacity while operating within a shared strategic horizon.
- Erosion of Air Superiority: Dispersed launch platforms, layered defenses, and mobile systems negate traditional dominance doctrines.
- Social Embeddedness: These actors are rooted in local societies, rendering isolation or decapitation strategies structurally ineffective.
What emerges is not an alliance chain, but a resilient network, one that converts geography, population, and technology into strategic depth.
๐๐๐๐๐ง๐จ๐ง: ๐๐จ๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐๐ข๐ ๐ง๐ญ๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ โ๐๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ฑ๐๐๐ฉ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐งโ
Lebanon constitutes the most volatile front. Here, pressure has shifted from kinetic warfare to material dispossession, currency collapse, banking restrictions, and financial siege designed to fracture the resistance environment from within.
Yet this strategy misreads the terrain.
The resistance operates through a deeply internalized habitus, a social structure where sacrifice, endurance, and collective memory generate symbolic capital immune to economic coercion.
Within this framework, the resistance exists in a permanent State of Exception, exercising a form of sovereignty parallel to, and more resilient than, the formal state.
Any attempt to force a confrontation between this actor and the national army risks total institutional implosion.
In material terms, the network will always outlast the institution.
๐๐ซ๐๐ช: ๐๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ฎ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ข๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ญ๐๐ญ๐
In Iraq, the boundary between external influence and internal sovereignty has collapsed.
Allied forces are embedded within the security apparatus, economic infrastructure, and political process itself.
โIsolationโ would require dismantling the Iraqi state, an act the West neither desires nor can manage.
The re-emergence of assertive political configurations in Baghdad restores a contiguous logistical axis linking Iran to the Levant.
The strategic dilemma is absolute: normalize this reality or trigger a vacuum that will be filled by forces far less controllable.
๐๐๐ฆ๐๐ง: ๐๐ก๐๐ซ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐๐ซ ๐๐๐๐ญ๐ฌ ๐๐ฅ๐จ๐๐๐ฅ ๐๐ซ๐๐๐
Yemen is where asymmetry becomes global.
By exploiting geographic chokepoints and low-cost strike capabilities, it has transformed maritime commerce into a pressure lever against the international system itself.
This is not a peripheral theater.
It is a friction node where a materially inferior actor imposes disproportionate economic costs on global powers, demonstrating that control of flows can rival control of territory.
๐๐ก๐ ๐๐จ๐ ๐ข๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ โ๐๐๐ฏ๐๐ง๐ ๐ ๐๐จ๐๐๐๐ข๐๐ข๐๐ง๐ญโ
Western strategy assumes escalation can be managed through calibrated attrition.
This assumption is flawed. While one side calculates cost, the other operates under a Sovereign Doctrine rooted in existential survival.
Here enters the decisive variable: the Revenge Coefficient.
When symbolic thresholds are crossed, through high-level assassinations or violations of sacred political centers, the logic shifts.
Deterrence collapses into Strategic Revenge.
From a materialist lens, this appears irrational.
Within the moral economy of the region, it is compulsory.
๐ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ข๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ
If confrontation with Iran expands, it will not begin in Tehran.
It will unfold along Lebanonโs internal fault lines, inside Iraqโs institutions, and across Yemenโs maritime corridors.
The war is no longer a future scenario, it is a distributed condition.
The center cannot be struck until the socio-technical networks and sovereign logics of the periphery are dismantled. Current conditions suggest this is unachievable without total regional rupture.
In this war, the periphery is the battlefield, and the battlefield is already alive.
posted by Satish Sharma at
04:16
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home