Why are #CNN and #LeMonde treating #Gaza’s famine as a “controversy”? Why avoid the word famine when the UN calls it “deliberate and widespread”? And how does “false balance” turn a war crime into a “disputed narrative”?
https://x.com/AJR_English/status/1947295686527226052
Why are #CNN and #LeMonde treating #Gaza’s famine as a “controversy”?
Why avoid the word famine when the UN calls it “deliberate and widespread”?
And how does “false balance” turn a war crime into a “disputed narrative”?
* Diluting the Palestinian narrative with cautious headlines
CNN framed a child’s starvation as a “food crisis”. Le Monde deferred to Israeli claims. Neither placed Israel as the central actor --grammatically or morally.
* Sidestepping famine; softening facts Both outlets cite famine only via Palestinian or NGO voices, while pairing them with Israeli rebuttals --turning the situation into a “he said, she said”.
* Manufactured balance
Where Ukraine coverage names the aggressor, Gaza coverage defaults to symmetry, turning starvation into a matter of opinion, not law.
Read the full breakdown: [institute.aljazeera.net/en/ajr/article]
#Gaza #Famine #MediaBias #CNN #LeMonde #JournalismMatters #EthicsInMedia

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home