Friday 18 October 2024

‘Comforting delusion’: Hamas leader’s death will not bring ‘security’ for Israelis


Loaded22.53%
Current Time 0:23
Duration 5:51

‘Comforting delusion’: Hamas leader’s death will not bring ‘security’ for Israelis

 Independent journalist and author Antony Loewenstein says the “circumstances have not changed” in the Middle East following the death of Yahya Sinwar.


Hamas leader and October 7 mastermind Yahya Sinwar is dead.

He was killed by Israeli troops who were shelling his hiding place without knowing who they were targeting.

“There is a comforting delusion that many people have who maybe support Israel, who oppose Hamas or Hezbollah that by killing a leader, you somehow bring Israel or Israeli security and safety,” Mr Loewenstein told Sky News Australia.

“History suggests that’s just not true.”

https://www.skynews.com.au/world-news/global-affairs/comforting-delusion-hamas-leaders-death-will-not-bring-security-for-israelis/video/4ec27374657159b3babed4845b90f31b

Hamas chief's killing may revive peace talks, but US sincerity and Israeli defiance raise doubts

 US has contacted Egypt and Qatar about reviving ceasefire talks but Israel has shown little willingness as it expands war aims

Pro-Palestinian protester holds up a portrait of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar outside of a campaign event for US Vice President Kamala Harris in New York City, on 14 August 2024 (David 'Dee' Delgado/Reuters)
By Sean Mathews in Washington DC

Israel’s announcement on Thursday of the killing of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar in Gaza has seemingly fuelled the US with new energy to pursue a stalled ceasefire agreement, but it faces a short window of opportunity and an emboldened ally as it looks to revive a deal. 

President Joe Biden hailed the Hamas leader’s death as "a good day for Israel, for the United States, and for the world", on Thursday, according to a statement published by the White House. 

He then pivoted to a ceasefire which has so far not materialised despite several American proclamations that a deal was "close".

The Biden administration's reluctance to use any leverage against Israel for a ceasefire has brought into question the administration's sincerity in wanting an end to the war on Gaza. It has also dulled perceptions of Washington's ability to influence events as escalations between Israel and Iran, and Israel's invasion of Lebanon, bring the region to the brink of an all-out war.

"There is now the opportunity for a 'day after' in Gaza without Hamas in power, and for a political settlement that provides a better future for Israelis and Palestinians alike,” Biden said. 

“Yahya Sinwar was an insurmountable obstacle to achieving all of those goals. That obstacle no longer exists.” 

US officials are now scrambling to revive ceasefire talks that just days ago the White House said were frozen, according to one current and two former senior US officials. 

“This administration believed the utility of the war diminished three or four months ago. Now they have an impetus to take another stab at talks,” David Schenker, a former US State Department official, told MEE. 

President Biden’s senior advisors have already reached out to mediators Egypt and Qatar, one of the former senior officials briefed by the administration told MEE, adding that the White House could dispatch CIA chief Bill Burns back to the region in the coming weeks.

Reports emerged on Thursday that a trip to the Middle East was imminent for US Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

“Sinwar’s death opens the door for a possible deal. The administration is going to try and run with this to see if they can take the talks out of deadlock,” Alan Pino, a former CIA and National Intelligence Council  officer for the Middle East told MEE. 

But Patrick Theros, the former US ambassador to Qatar, said the US might be too late in thinking a ceasefire can put a lid on regional tensions.

"Gaza is rapidly becoming an irrelevant victim. The momentum has shifted to the Lebanon war, and soon maybe an Iran war. Gaza is a sideshow and Sinwar's killing is a complication, not a show-stopper," Theros told MEE.

Plan B?

Sinwar’s death is an opportunity for the Biden administration, but it could also serve as a moment of clarity.

For one year, the US provided intelligence to help Israel find and kill Sinwar. "I said to Bibi (Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu), 'Don't make the same mistake we made in America. We wanted to get bin Laden. We'll help you get Sinwar," Biden told CNN in May.

'Failure or deception?': Iran missile attack, Israel's Lebanon invasion taint Biden's diplomacy
Read More »

During months of ceasefire talks, the US blamed Hamas - specifically “Mr Sinwar” as US spokesmen politely but awkwardly referred to him - for standing in the way of a grand deal that could end the war in Gaza and reduce regional tensions. 

“I wish I could tell you that there are fresh negotiations at hand. There aren’t, but that’s because Mr Sinwar has shown absolutely zero interest in continuing that discussion,” White House spokesperson John Kirby said on Tuesday, just 48 hours before Sinwar was killed. 

Sinwar was widely considered the mastermind of the Hamas-led 7 October 2023 attack on southern Israel and had ultimate control over fighters and hostages in Gaza. He was named Hamas leader after Ismail Haniyeh was assassinated in Tehran. 

Analysts and regional officials tell MEE that Sinwar was a hardline negotiator who believed the mass civilian death toll in Gaza and flareup in regional tensions were blows to Israel’s standing on the world stage and security. He felt little urgency to end the war if it wasn’t on his terms. 

“Sinwar always had the final say. It is true,” Merissa Khurma, an expert at the Wilson Center told MEE. “But if the Biden administration knew he was the obstacle, now is the time that we should see their plan B. Who was their alternative path to a deal?” 

No surrender?

While the Biden administration blamed Sinwar for a lack of progress on a ceasefire, in reality, it has been Israel that has regularly reneged in the talks and added demands that analysts say may be impossible for Hamas - under any leader - to agree on. 

Inside Gaza, Israel insisted on its military retaining the ability to operate at will, even if the remaining hostages taken on 7 October 2023 were to be returned by Hamas. 

Netanyahu also demanded Israel maintain control of two key slivers of land: the Philadelphi Corridor, a 14km strip of land between Gaza and Egypt that Israel said Hamas has used to smuggle weapons, and the Netzarim Corridor, a narrow zone that Israel carved out to separate northern and southern Gaza.

“There are certain red lines for Hamas with or without Sinwar,” Michael Wahid Hanna, US programme director at the International Crisis Group said, which included a "permanent Israeli occupation of Gaza". 

“I think it would be mistaken to think that a weakened Hamas will accept any form of surrender,” he added.

'I think it would be mistaken to think that a weakened Hamas will accept any form of surrender'

- Michael Wahid Hanna, International Crisis Group

While Hamas has still demonstrated its ability to strike Israeli troops and launch missiles, analysts say it is not the same fighting force it was before the 7 October 2023 attack, and Sinwar’s death will have an operational, not just symbolic, impact. 

With US arms flowing regularly to Israel and the 2024 US presidential election just three weeks away, the fate of ceasefire talks is likely to rest on Hamas’s calculations. 

“Strategically, Hamas does not want to end this thing on Israel's terms, but for tactical reasons, they may now be more willing to look at a pause that will help them regroup and would be popular with Palestinians,” Pino said.  

Several Hamas leaders have been killed in the past, like its founder Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, while others like Ismail Haniyeh, Marwan Issa and Mohammed Deif were reportedly killed during the current war. Often hardline leaders have emerged in their shadows and succession plans have been in place to prevent severe factionalisation, leading to doubts about the operational impact of removing leadership figures.

Sinwar vacuum

The last serious attempt to broker a ceasefire was in July when CIA director Bill Burns met with Qatari, Israeli and Egyptian officials in Rome. Shortly after that meeting, Israel assassinated Haniyeh in Tehran and within one month had taken out most of Hezbollah’s senior leadership. Israel has now invaded Lebanon. 

“The regional situation has only complicated Gaza talks. The US would not be doing this in a vacuum. The situation from a few months ago has changed with a war in Lebanon and impending Israeli strike on Iran,” Khurma said. 

Israel expanded the war in Gaza to Lebanon amid frustration that Hezbollah insisted on linking a truce with Israel to a ceasefire in Gaza. The Lebanese group began firing missiles into Israel on 8 October 2023, in what it said was in solidarity with Palestinians. 

“The same security establishment in Israel pushing for a ceasefire in Gaza wants to prosecute the war in Lebanon,” Hanna said. 

“Now we could be in a twisted scenario, where the question is: Will Hamas decouple itself from Hezbollah and the Lebanon front?” Hanna added. 

For its part, Israel welcomed Sinwar’s death with celebrations on the street Thursday night. 

Yahya Sinwar: The refugee and prisoner who went on to lead Hamas
Read More »

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu took a victory lap, saying that Sinwar’s death in Rafah was a vindication of his government's decision to launch a deadly attack on Rafah in May, despite an outcry from rights organisations, the US and Israel’s Arab neighbours. 

“The war... is not over yet,” he said, suggesting that Israel could look to use the momentum of Sinwar’s killing to justify its offensive further. 

But Netanyahu also suggested Israel was considering its mission to kill Hamas’s senior leadership complete. Addressing rank and file fighters, he said: "Whoever lays down his weapon and returns our hostages - we will allow him to go on living.” 

Analysts say it's not clear who will succeed Sinwar. The two most likely candidates are Khalil al-Hayya, his Gaza deputy, and former Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal, who resides in Qatar. Sinwar's brother, Muhammad Sinwar, is also a commander on the ground. 

Michael Milshtein, a former Israeli intelligence official, says that Hamas could end up with a more malleable leader, but it's still an open question whether the Israeli government can be moderated.

“If the vacuum of his death is filled with a leader from outside, Hamas could be more flexible. The other question is Israeli politics, and it’s not so simple for Netanyahu to convince members of his government to support a deal,” Milshtein told MEE. 

Still, with a tight US election only a few weeks away, some analysts say if Hamas agrees to some of Israel’s demands, Netanyahu could agree to a ceasefire.

Netanyahu faces an unusual US threat to withhold arms to Israel over the humanitarian crisis in northern Gaza and he may also want a ceasefire, even a partial one to begin the process of negotiating Gaza’s post-war future with the next US administration. 

“Even if Hamas is amenable to a ceasefire, is there a leader in Gaza who could deliver the hostages back to Israel? That is not clear at this time,” Schenker, the former US State Department official, told MEE. 

“And, of course, Israel will not give Hamas or the PA a free hand in running the Rafah border crossing.”

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/hamas-sinwar-killing-peace-talks-israel-defiance-us-sincerity-raise-doubts


Scott Ritter Drop Bombshell: U.S Orders Israel to Use Nuclear to END War - Iran Claims to Have Nukes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAya7O8ksWg 

Police escalate the British state’s war on independent journalism

 

Opens profile photo

18 October 2024


Jonathan Cook

The raid on investigative journalist Asa Winstanley isn’t about terrorism – except the UK government’s. It is about scaring us into staying silent on Britain’s collusion in Israel’s genocide

The UK government and police – the British state – made clear today it is waging a war of intimidation against the country’s independent journalists in a desperate attempt to silence them.

Ten Metropolitan police officers made a dawn raid on the home of investigative journalist Asa Winstanley and seized his electronic devices under the UK’s draconian Terrorism Act. A letter from the Met indicates that the associate editor of the Electronic Intifada is being investigated by the force for “encouraging terrorism”.

Winstanley is the latest – and most high profile – independent journalist to be targeted by counter-terrorism police in recent weeks. Earlier, Richard Medhurst was arrested at Heathrow airport on returning to the UK from a trip abroad. Then Sarah Wilkinson was arrested and her home ransacked.

Winstanley has repeatedly embarrassed the British establishment by exposing its covert and deep ties to Israel and its collusion with the Israeli lobby.

In his book Weaponising Anti-Semitism: How the Israel Lobby Brought Down Jeremy Corbyn, Winstanley exposed in shocking detail how antisemitism was weaponised against the former Labour leader.

The book would have made uncomfortable reading for his successor, Sir Keir Starmer, now Britain’s prime minister, because it documents his role in the smear campaign. While in opposition, Starmer’s Labour party expelled Winstanley and made legal threats against him.

As the Electronic Intifada website notes: “Now that Labour is the UK’s ruling party, it has the potential to use the apparatus of the state against those it views as its own – or Israel’s – political enemies.”

There is precisely no reason for police to raid Winstanley’s home or seize his electronic devices. The preposterous accusation of “encouraging terrorism” clearly relates to his online work, which is fully in the public domain.

The British state wants to insinuate through the dawn raid and confiscation of his devices that he is somehow harbouring secret or classified information, or in illicit contact with terror groups, and that incriminating evidence will be forthcoming from searches of those devices.

It won’t. If there were any real suspicion that Winstanley had such information, the police would have arrested him rather making a public show of a 6am raid and search they knew beforehand would turn up nothing.

This isn’t about terrorism at all. It is about frightening those opposing Israel’s genocide in Gaza, and the West’s collusion in it, into silence. If the British state is going after someone like Winstanley, you are supposed to conclude, they will surely soon come for me too.

Even the name of the “counter-terrorism” raid is performative: “Operation Incessantness”. The message the state wants to send is that it will not rest till it has us all behind bars.

Don’t believe this nonsense. The police have nothing on Winstanley. Exposing information about Israel and its genocide, and the British government’s culpability, is not a crime. At least not yet.

They want you to think it is, of course. They want you scared and mute. Because every time you go out and protest, you remind the world that the British government, and their bully-boys in blue, are the real criminals – for enabling genocide.



https://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2024-10-18/police-britain-war-independent-journalism/

How Ta-Nehisi Coates broke free of liberal Zionism

 Hamid Dabashi

The acclaimed African-American author's new book marks his deliverance from Zionist prose and signals a broader cultural shift in the US that is critical of Israel

The United States is the single most powerful supporter of the Israeli settler colony.

The US government heavily arms and gives political cover to Israel, and considers the people at the mercy of its aggression as America's enemies. And president after president, Republican and Democrat, has enabled Israel to commit war crimescrimes against humanity, and even genocide with total impunity.

The current genocide Israel is committing in Palestine is legally and morally placed at the doorstep of the US.

Therefore, what happens in the US - especially when the political mainstream begins to wake up and see Zionism for the apocalyptic genocidal fanaticism that it is - matters for world peace.

Zionists - whether Israeli or American, Christian or Jewish - do not like the prospects of that awakening.

As the racist and colonial nature of Israel's regime became more widely recognised, the experiences between Palestinians and the African American community also became more prominently linked, especially in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement.

Over the last year, several outlets - from The New York Times to PoliticoVox, and others - published articles examining the history of Black and Palestinian solidarity.

Indeed, these discussions emerged in full force after 7 October 2023 as several leading African American public figures and intellectuals made clear their stance on Israel - even making headlines on "how Gaza has shaken Black politics".

When US Ambassador to the United Nations Linda Thomas-Greenfield raises her hand and vetoes one Security Council resolution after another to stop the Israeli murderous machinery; when we see US Secretary of Defence Lloyd J Austin III in the news pledging his mighty military will protect Israel against attempts to stop its rampage; when the irredeemably corrupt New York City Mayor Eric Adams delivers nauseating "stand with Israel" speeches, something deep in the history of African American experience cries foul.  

And when Congresswoman Cori Bush of Missouri avows: "Aipac [American Israel Public Affairs Committee], I'm coming to tear your kingdom down!" she invokes an entirely different legacy of solidarity with Palestinians in African American history, as Israel systematically unleashes its savageries against Palestinians and other Arab nations like Lebanon.

Towering figures like Malcolm XJames BaldwinAngela DavisAlice Walker, and Cornel West have been bold, precise, and hard-hitting when it comes to condemning the criminal atrocities of the US and Israel in cahoots together.

Re-enter Ta-Nehisi Coates

It was not too long ago when the heat on Ta-Nehisi Coates, a prominent African-American literary and critical voice, got so bad he ran out of the kitchen.

Back in 2017, he deleted his Twitter account with millions of followers and went into occultation following a scathing critique levelled against him by the unflinching moral conscience of Cornel West, a distinguished scholar and activist who called him "the neoliberal face of the black freedom struggle".

How Cori Bush stood up to the forces of racism and colonialism
Read More »

Coates soon left his main outlet, The Atlantic, a major Zionist operation run by former Israeli prison guard Jeffrey Goldberg, that was grooming him as a feather in their Israeli hat. For years, he would oblige.

Coates published his 2008 hymn for Israel, "The Negro Sings of Zionism", which he followed with "The Case for Reparations" in 2014. The essay, which sparked criticism among Palestine advocates, made him a darling of American Zionists.

Coates presented Israel as the model for reparations and thought African Americans ought to do the same as the Israeli state did with Germans.

For a decade now, that bit of Zionist newspeak he embraced under the condition he now calls "default Zionism" has haunted his conscience. Rightly so: today, when he appears for public interviews, he repeatedly says: "I am ashamed!"

He should be.

Had he not heard of Edward Said when he was entrapped in that "default Zionism"? Any answer he might give to that simple question would be even more incriminating.


Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war


The most damning assessment of Coates, however, was not by West, who said in 2017 that Coates "reaps the benefits of the neoliberal establishment that rewards silences on issues such as Wall Street greed or Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands and people."

In his characteristically patient and precise prose, the eminent Indian public intellectual Pankaj Mishra published a major review of Coates's 2017 book on the Obama era, We Were Eight Years in Power, in the London Review of Books.

Mishra detailed and dissected Coates's deeply white-identified career, which banked on his Black identity to drive guilt-ridden white America to celebrate him - just as Barack and Michelle Obama had done. This was a fact that West had also intuited and laid bare to him.

Mishra picked up on Coates's own sense of wonder in himself, "Why do white people like what I write?" and analysed with surgical precision:  

"[Coates] also visibly struggles with the question, 'Why do white people like what I write?' This is a fraught issue for the very few writers from formerly colonised countries or historically disadvantaged minorities in the West who are embraced by 'legacy' periodicals, and then tasked with representing their people – or country, religion, race, and even continent (as in the New York Times's praise for Salman Rushdie: 'A continent finding its voice'). Relations between the anointed 'representative' writer and those who are denied this privilege by white gatekeepers are notoriously prickly. Coates, a self-made writer, is particularly vulnerable to the charge that he is popular among white liberals since he assuages their guilt about racism."

This was published in February 2018, just a few months after West had, with the stroke of a few bold and brilliant paragraphs, forced Coates into early withdrawal from the public to lick his wounds.

It did him good and well.

His new book, The Message, is his deliverance from error, as it were, his version of al-Ghazali's classic al-Munkidh min al-Dalal/Deliverance from Darkness, published nearly 1000 years ago.

Imagine that! A young African American writer publishes a book that reminds me, a Muslim, of the autobiographical masterpiece of a towering Muslim philosopher mystic. This should mean more to him than any Pulitzer or Booker.

But Coates's visit to Palestine for just 10 days is reminiscent of another even closer Muslim to his home and habitat when Malcolm X visited Gaza in September 1964.

The long essay Coates wrote on his visit to Palestine, which is included in his book, marks his deliverance from Zionist prose

On this occasion, he wrote: "The ever-scheming European imperialists wisely placed Israel where she could geographically divide the Arab world, infiltrate and sow the seed of dissension among African leaders and also divide the Africans against the Asians."

Bearing witness to Palestinian suffering and Zionist thuggeries, Coates has a giant pair of shoes to fill if he continues on this path.  

The long essay Coates wrote on his visit to Palestine, which is included in his book, marks his deliverance from Zionist prose.

For generations, liberal Zionists have infiltrated the ranks of American liberal imperialists with terror visited upon the world. West and Mishra saw through Coates clearly; now, so has he.  

Deliverance from Zionism

Immediately after the publication of Coates's latest book, the pro-Israel hasbara machinery, of course, went berserk and unleashed its furies, the racist nature of which managed to surprise even Coates himself.

Other liberal Zionists like Ezra Klein of The New York Times tried to undermine his arguments by asking him why he did not consult with rabid Zionists in Israel when he was there, and of course, setting the usual propaganda trap, "What about Hamas?" 

Just like her predecessors, Kamala Harris is fully on board with Israel's genocide
Read More »

As defined and determined by well-endowed and ideologically committed outlets like The Times, The Wall Street Journal, and The Atlantic, the US media is a well-oiled propaganda machinery of hasbara-informed pro-Israel newspeak.

Previously, when others like Coates suddenly found a conscience, the mainstream press just turned a deaf ear and pretended it did not happen. Perhaps one recent example is New York Congressman Jamaal Bowman, whose changed position on Israel not only cost him his re-election campaign but has largely relegated him to obscurity.

Given his influence on the white liberal establishment and their understanding of race and diversity in this country, can Coates be marginalised like any other American who dares speak the truth about Israel, let alone at this particular moment in history?

The gap between the liberating truth Coates now sees and speaks and the ugly propaganda Zionists continue to keep dominant in American political culture is now widening apace.

More than half a century after the Civil Rights movement - when the world thought racism had been dealt with - Americans gave Donald Trump to the world right after Obama lent his Black identity to career opportunist liberal imperialism of the worst kind.

The stockpile of bombs the Israelis are dropping on Palestinians, Lebanese, Syrians, Yemenis, and others remains Obama's legacy in the Middle East.

The gap between the liberating truth Coates now sees and speaks and the ugly propaganda Zionists continue to keep dominant in American political culture is now widening

As I write, Americans are almost evenly split on the upcoming presidential election, poised to vote for either a Mussolini wannabe rank charlatan fascist or a Genocide Joe replacement who, like a parrot or a broken record, can only repeat Aipac talking points.

Between a genocidal administration with the blood of tens of thousands of Palestinians and Lebanese on its hands and a fascist wannabe, the future of the US and all its global warmongering, particularly its Israeli garrison state, is now being determined.

The significance of what Coates has written weighs far less for Palestinians who have equally if not more eloquent voices to speak on their behalf.

But for Americans, Coates's corrective message may both inspire and signal a broader cultural shift in which this country may be liberated from the curse of Zionism. 

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

Hamid Dabashi is Hagop Kevorkian Professor of Iranian Studies and Comparative Literature at Columbia University in the City of New York, where he teaches Comparative Literature, World Cinema, and Postcolonial Theory. His latest books include The Future of Two Illusions: Islam after the West (2022); The Last Muslim Intellectual: The Life and Legacy of Jalal Al-e Ahmad (2021); Reversing the Colonial Gaze: Persian Travelers Abroad (2020), and The Emperor is Naked: On the Inevitable Demise of the Nation-State (2020). His books and essays have been translated into many languages.

https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/israel-palestine-ta-nehisi-coates-broke-free-zionism