NSW Supreme Court criticises IHRA definition as 'detached from reality' ‘.. the IHRA formulation “appears to be an attempt to repurpose the term ‘antisemitism’”’
https://x.com/MaryKostakidis/status/2089697324809556053
NSW Supreme Court criticises IHRA definition as 'detached from reality' ‘.. the IHRA formulation “appears to be an attempt to repurpose the term ‘antisemitism’”’
‘The fact that governments and several institutions had adopted the IHRA wording did not, Fagan said, “change the established meaning of a word that has been in use in the English language for 150 years”.’
‘“It may well be correct that ‘most, but not all Jewish Australians’ regard Zionism as ‘a core part of their Jewish identity’,” Fagan’s judgement read. “That does not mean that anti-Zionists are hostile to that majority of Jews on account of their Jewishness; only that they hold a negative view of a political ideology with which the majority of Jews have chosen to identify.”’
Amen.
posted by Satish Sharma at
13:12
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home