Netanyahu's Bet Turned Out to Be a Losing One He was betting on the trembling hands of the Iranians and their fear of retaliation,
https://x.com/sameh_asker/status/2063732954518671740
Translated from Arabic
Netanyahu's Bet Turned Out to Be a Losing One
He was betting on the trembling hands of the Iranians and their fear of retaliation, but it turned out that Iran after Khamenei's assassination is completely different from what it was before.
Look, sir, here's what happened today so we're all in the picture
First off, Israel struck the southern suburbs of Beirut today in broad daylight, the attack led to the martyrdom of two civilians and the injury of about 20 residents.
Israel said the attack was symbolic and not intended as an assassination or major assault on the Party, so what's the sin of the people who died? And why launch the attack in the first place if they know the Iranians have set a military equation that Lebanon's capital security equals Israel's security?
No answer, of course, because Israel's extremist Zionist right-wing administration cares about keeping the war going, and because it basically lives off war and destruction and battles and doesn't believe in the idea of peace with neighbors unless they're under control.
Iran didn't deny the report, it immediately decided to shell Israel in response to this aggression and to reaffirm the current rules of engagement that the Iranians drew up since the ceasefire agreement with America on April 8th last...
And at the same time, it threatened that if Israel responds to the Iranian attack, it will face a bigger and broader assault
So that means we've understood that #ايران responded in a limited way, as most monitored analyses and press reports say that Iran launched only 10 - 11 missiles, none of which were hypersonic or fission ones, meaning it's a warning measure.
Israel, as usual, came out denying any casualties or material or human losses so it can say the attacks failed and therefore there's no deterrence and therefore the rules of engagement change and they're the winners and so on, and we all know this is pure nonsense.
On one hand, the verified videos coming from the entity show some Iranian missiles actually reaching their targets, and on the other hand, this is due to Zionist censorship that prevents any talk or reporting of losses, whether through communication or permission from the army's top command.
The bottom line is that Iran imposed a real rule of engagement and linked Lebanese national security to Israeli national security and Gulf security and American interests in the Gulf, and this is one of the biggest gains for the Axis in that phase, which Netanyahu is trying to cancel to no avail.
One last thing and this is what I'll wrap up with
We're currently witnessing the emergence of political and military alignments and axes that we haven't seen since World War II, completely and totally different from all the political, geographical, and nationalist blocs that formed over the past 80 years.
I mean, we're facing a new world different from the one you knew ten years ago, and therefore anyone who wants to understand what's happening now should get it through reality and culture, not through recent history and the political blocs that were tied to the era of nationalism, and explaining the topic would take too long, and we have a pause coming up anyway to explain what was said.
The image Made With Ai
First off, Israel struck the southern suburbs of Beirut today in broad daylight, the attack led to the martyrdom of two civilians and the injury of about 20 residents.
Israel said the attack was symbolic and not intended as an assassination or major assault on the Party, so what's the sin of the people who died? And why launch the attack in the first place if they know the Iranians have set a military equation that Lebanon's capital security equals Israel's security?
No answer, of course, because Israel's extremist Zionist right-wing administration cares about keeping the war going, and because it basically lives off war and destruction and battles and doesn't believe in the idea of peace with neighbors unless they're under control.
Iran didn't deny the report, it immediately decided to shell Israel in response to this aggression and to reaffirm the current rules of engagement that the Iranians drew up since the ceasefire agreement with America on April 8th last...
And at the same time, it threatened that if Israel responds to the Iranian attack, it will face a bigger and broader assault
So that means we've understood that #ايران responded in a limited way, as most monitored analyses and press reports say that Iran launched only 10 - 11 missiles, none of which were hypersonic or fission ones, meaning it's a warning measure.
Israel, as usual, came out denying any casualties or material or human losses so it can say the attacks failed and therefore there's no deterrence and therefore the rules of engagement change and they're the winners and so on, and we all know this is pure nonsense.
On one hand, the verified videos coming from the entity show some Iranian missiles actually reaching their targets, and on the other hand, this is due to Zionist censorship that prevents any talk or reporting of losses, whether through communication or permission from the army's top command.
The bottom line is that Iran imposed a real rule of engagement and linked Lebanese national security to Israeli national security and Gulf security and American interests in the Gulf, and this is one of the biggest gains for the Axis in that phase, which Netanyahu is trying to cancel to no avail.
One last thing and this is what I'll wrap up with
We're currently witnessing the emergence of political and military alignments and axes that we haven't seen since World War II, completely and totally different from all the political, geographical, and nationalist blocs that formed over the past 80 years.
I mean, we're facing a new world different from the one you knew ten years ago, and therefore anyone who wants to understand what's happening now should get it through reality and culture, not through recent history and the political blocs that were tied to the era of nationalism, and explaining the topic would take too long, and we have a pause coming up anyway to explain what was said.
The image Made With AiRate this translation:
posted by Satish Sharma at
04:24
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home