China just made it ILLEGAL to fire a human worker and replace them with AI.. and the way they found out is insane..
https://x.com/EvanLuthra/status/2050152299595780501
THIS IS INSANE!!!
China just made it ILLEGAL to fire a human worker and replace them with AI.. and the way they found out is insane..
a quality assurance supervisor named Zhou worked at an AI company in Hangzhou.. his job was verifying AI-generated content.. matching user queries with model outputs.. filtering hallucinations and illegal content..
he was literally training the AI to do his own job..
once the model got good enough.. the company told him they were moving him to a lower position.. with a 40% pay cut.. from 25,000 yuan to 15,000..
he refused.. they fired him..
he sued.. and won..
the Hangzhou court ruled that replacing a human with AI is not a valid reason to fire someone.. period..
their logic.. adopting AI is a voluntary business decision.. not an earthquake.. not a government shutdown.. not a force majeure event.. it's a choice the company made to save money..
and because it's a choice.. the company has to absorb the cost of that transition.. not dump it on the worker..
this wasn't a one-off ruling either..
in Beijing.. a map data collector named Liu spent over a decade manually collecting geographic data.. the company switched to AI-automated data collection.. eliminated his entire department.. fired him..
he sued.. won.. exact same reasoning.. AI adoption is a proactive business strategy.. not an unforeseeable external shock..
and here's what's happening in the background that makes these rulings so urgent..
unemployment for chinese workers aged 25 to 29 just hit a record 7.7%.. the highest since they started tracking that age group separately..
companies across china are literally forcing employees to document their daily workflows so AI models can learn to replace them.. workers are training their own replacements and they know it..
a 24-year-old engineer built an open-source tool called "Colleague.Skill" that scrapes your work chat history, emails, code commits, and documents.. and creates a digital clone of you that can do your exact job after you're gone..
he meant it as a dark joke.. it got 13,400 stars on GitHub in three weeks.. top 0.1% of all projects globally.. because it wasn't really a joke.. it was exactly what companies were already doing to their employees..
workers in Shanghai and Beijing told MIT Technology Review that management was actively coercing them to document everything specifically to train AI replacements..
china's response.. make it illegal..
the State Council launched the "AI Plus" initiative.. a ten-year plan that explicitly mandates AI must augment workers.. not replace them.. companies must use AI to upgrade existing roles.. not eliminate them..
by 2027.. smart devices and AI agents must reach 70% penetration.. by 2030.. over 90%.. but the growth has to create jobs.. not destroy them..
now compare this to the US..
in america.. at-will employment means your company can fire you and replace you with AI tomorrow.. no warning.. no severance negotiation.. no retraining obligation.. as long as they're not discriminating based on race, age, or disability.. it's perfectly legal..
there is no federal law protecting american workers from AI displacement.. none..
california proposed a bill requiring just 30 days notice before deploying AI that affects employment.. that's the most aggressive protection any US state has attempted..
china made it illegal to fire you.. america doesn't even require a heads up..
and here's the irony nobody is talking about..
china.. the country the west accuses of having no worker protections.. just gave its workers more protection from AI than any democracy on earth..
the question isn't whether AI will replace jobs..
it's whether your country will protect you when it does.
China just made it ILLEGAL to fire a human worker and replace them with AI.. and the way they found out is insane..
a quality assurance supervisor named Zhou worked at an AI company in Hangzhou.. his job was verifying AI-generated content.. matching user queries with model outputs.. filtering hallucinations and illegal content..
he was literally training the AI to do his own job..
once the model got good enough.. the company told him they were moving him to a lower position.. with a 40% pay cut.. from 25,000 yuan to 15,000..
he refused.. they fired him..
he sued.. and won..
the Hangzhou court ruled that replacing a human with AI is not a valid reason to fire someone.. period..
their logic.. adopting AI is a voluntary business decision.. not an earthquake.. not a government shutdown.. not a force majeure event.. it's a choice the company made to save money..
and because it's a choice.. the company has to absorb the cost of that transition.. not dump it on the worker..
this wasn't a one-off ruling either..
in Beijing.. a map data collector named Liu spent over a decade manually collecting geographic data.. the company switched to AI-automated data collection.. eliminated his entire department.. fired him..
he sued.. won.. exact same reasoning.. AI adoption is a proactive business strategy.. not an unforeseeable external shock..
and here's what's happening in the background that makes these rulings so urgent..
unemployment for chinese workers aged 25 to 29 just hit a record 7.7%.. the highest since they started tracking that age group separately..
companies across china are literally forcing employees to document their daily workflows so AI models can learn to replace them.. workers are training their own replacements and they know it..
a 24-year-old engineer built an open-source tool called "Colleague.Skill" that scrapes your work chat history, emails, code commits, and documents.. and creates a digital clone of you that can do your exact job after you're gone..
he meant it as a dark joke.. it got 13,400 stars on GitHub in three weeks.. top 0.1% of all projects globally.. because it wasn't really a joke.. it was exactly what companies were already doing to their employees..
workers in Shanghai and Beijing told MIT Technology Review that management was actively coercing them to document everything specifically to train AI replacements..
china's response.. make it illegal..
the State Council launched the "AI Plus" initiative.. a ten-year plan that explicitly mandates AI must augment workers.. not replace them.. companies must use AI to upgrade existing roles.. not eliminate them..
by 2027.. smart devices and AI agents must reach 70% penetration.. by 2030.. over 90%.. but the growth has to create jobs.. not destroy them..
now compare this to the US..
in america.. at-will employment means your company can fire you and replace you with AI tomorrow.. no warning.. no severance negotiation.. no retraining obligation.. as long as they're not discriminating based on race, age, or disability.. it's perfectly legal..
there is no federal law protecting american workers from AI displacement.. none..
california proposed a bill requiring just 30 days notice before deploying AI that affects employment.. that's the most aggressive protection any US state has attempted..
china made it illegal to fire you.. america doesn't even require a heads up..
and here's the irony nobody is talking about..
china.. the country the west accuses of having no worker protections.. just gave its workers more protection from AI than any democracy on earth..
the question isn't whether AI will replace jobs..
it's whether your country will protect you when it does.
posted by Satish Sharma at
04:26
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home