Iran has not accepted the US/Israel terms for establishing peace.
https://x.com/pati_marins64/status/2043160614336418196
The bad news
In JD Vance’s own words, he stated that Iran has not accepted the US/Israel terms for establishing peace.
But I’d like to know what kind of negotiation this is, in which terms are simply imposed. Did anyone inform the American delegation that this isn’t a surrender treaty?
They seem to be living in a different reality. This is not how you negotiate peace, and this delegation certainly includes many people who know that very well.
Here are 10 points explaining why Iran is not in a position to give in:
1. It controls the Strait of Hormuz, and any attempt to take it would be extremely bloody and result in heavy casualties;
2. It can close the other strait using the Houthis;
3. It has maintained a stable daily rate of missile and drone launches for several weeks, demonstrating it has a large arsenal;
4. Its ground forces still have intact equipment and high morale, especially after the failure at Isfahan;
5. No one knows where the enriched uranium is, nor is there any effective way to seize it;
6. It is Iran that is effectively sanctioning America, with fuel prices and inflation already knocking at the door;
7. It is Iran generating pressure on Trump from Gulf countries;
8. It is Iran generating pressure on Trump from its Asian and European allies;
9. Iran is well aware of the shortage of interceptors and is actively exploiting it;
10. Its air defense capabilities are gradually improving through the deployment of new equipment, showing that Iran has a long-term strategy.
On the other hand, the daily bombings are steadily eroding Iranian infrastructure. The decisive factor in this war is precisely whether this resilience will prove sustainable in the long run.
posted by Satish Sharma at
08:57
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home