𝐁𝐚𝐠𝐡𝐝𝐚𝐝’𝐬 𝐆𝐚𝐦𝐛𝐢𝐭: 𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐈𝐫𝐚𝐧 𝐏𝐥𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐂𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐈𝐫𝐚𝐪
https://x.com/ibrahimtmajed/status/2016180271326863698
𝐁𝐚𝐠𝐡𝐝𝐚𝐝’𝐬 𝐆𝐚𝐦𝐛𝐢𝐭: 𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐈𝐫𝐚𝐧 𝐏𝐥𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐂𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐈𝐫𝐚𝐪
In the muted corridors of Iraq’s Green Zone, where power rarely disappears and only recedes, a familiar name has resurfaced.
The winter air hangs heavy with diesel fumes and unfinished wars, and with it comes a message: Iraq’s long experiment with balance, ambiguity, and tactical neutrality may be over.
The January 24 nomination of Nouri al-Maliki to lead the Iraqi executive branch is not a routine political maneuver.
It is a rupture. A declaration.
A signal that the Shiite Coordination Framework has decided the era of fragility has run its course.
This is not about governance. It is about survival.
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐄𝐱𝐜𝐞𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐌𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐢, 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐍𝐨𝐰
By resurrecting Maliki, a figure synonymous with centralization, confrontation, and unambiguous alignment with Tehran, Iraq’s ruling Shiite bloc has invoked what can only be described as a “sovereign exception.” Normal diplomatic logic has been suspended in favor of raw strategic necessity.
Maliki is not chosen despite his history. He is chosen because of it.
His record signals something crucial: Baghdad is no longer trying to reassure Washington, Gulf capitals, or international markets. It is preparing for pressure, not partnership.
The message is blunt, if the system is closing in, Iraq will harden rather than bend.
𝐓𝐞𝐡𝐫𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐬 𝐒𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐜 𝐃𝐞𝐩𝐭𝐡: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐔𝐦𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐋𝐢𝐧𝐤
For Iraq’s Shiite political class, Iran is no longer merely an ally or a neighbor. It has become strategic depth, a historical insurance policy against exclusion, fragmentation, and reversal.
This bond is not ideological alone. It is existential.
The memory of marginalization before 2003 still governs decision-making. Tehran represents continuity, protection, and leverage in a region that has repeatedly punished Iraqi Shiite power when it stood alone. In this calculus, the collapse of the Iranian state is not a foreign crisis, it is an Iraqi one.
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐫 𝐚𝐬 𝐖𝐞𝐚𝐩𝐨𝐧: 𝐀𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚’𝐬 𝐀𝐥𝐠𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐦𝐢𝐜 𝐎𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧
The adversary Baghdad now fears most does not arrive with tanks or drones.
It arrives with spreadsheets.
Over the past year, Washington has perfected a strategy of financial containment.
Iraq’s oil revenues, held at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, have become leverage points.
The dismantling of the dollar auction system in early 2025 and the enforcement of intrusive “know your customer” regimes across state payrolls have effectively placed Iraq’s economy under digital supervision.
To many in Baghdad, this is not reform. It is financial trusteeship.
The result is a slow, suffocating erosion of sovereignty, an occupation without soldiers, enforced by code.
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐂𝐡𝐨𝐢𝐜𝐞: 𝐒𝐮𝐛𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐫 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐨𝐥𝐭
Iraq now faces a stark equation:
- Accept permanent subordination to a dollar-centric financial order
- Or revolt, knowing the cost may be economic devastation
Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani attempted to delay this reckoning, balancing Tehran’s demands with Washington’s red lines. Maliki’s return signals that this balancing act has failed.
The era of maneuver is closing. The era of decision has arrived.
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐋𝐨𝐠𝐢𝐜: 𝐏𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐮𝐭𝐨𝐧𝐨𝐦𝐲
A strongman is not chosen to negotiate hardship away, but to endure it.
The Shiite Coordination Framework appears to be betting that collective identity, historical memory, and regional alignment can absorb economic shock in exchange for political independence. Sanctions, currency stress, and isolation are being reframed not as failures, but as rites of passage toward true sovereignty.
This is a dangerous wager. But to its architects, it is the only remaining one.
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐎𝐢𝐥 𝐖𝐞𝐚𝐩𝐨𝐧: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐓𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐚 𝐒𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧
With 90 percent of state revenue tied to oil exports, Iraq’s ultimate countermeasure is also its most self-destructive.
Analysts tracking regional escalation point to a rapidly rising “revenge coefficient” following the confrontations of 2025. In this climate, the once-unthinkable scenario, a suspension of oil exports to Western markets as a form of counter-sanction, is now openly discussed in elite circles.
Current estimates place the probability of a direct sovereign collision at 82 percent in the first half of the year.
If that line is crossed, Iraq would not merely challenge the system. It would detonate inside it.
𝐂𝐡𝐞𝐜𝐤, 𝐨𝐫 𝐂𝐡𝐞𝐜𝐤𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐞
As the Federal Reserve scrutinizes balances and Tehran secures corridors, Baghdad stands exposed, caught between liquidity and loyalty, between survival and submission.
The Iranian chess move has been played. The strongman has returned.
Now the question is no longer whether Iraq can live comfortably within the international system, but whether it is prepared to die politically outside of it.
History suggests that when sovereignty is cornered, nations rarely choose quietly.
They choose loudly.
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐄𝐱𝐜𝐞𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐌𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐢, 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐍𝐨𝐰
By resurrecting Maliki, a figure synonymous with centralization, confrontation, and unambiguous alignment with Tehran, Iraq’s ruling Shiite bloc has invoked what can only be described as a “sovereign exception.” Normal diplomatic logic has been suspended in favor of raw strategic necessity.
Maliki is not chosen despite his history. He is chosen because of it.
His record signals something crucial: Baghdad is no longer trying to reassure Washington, Gulf capitals, or international markets. It is preparing for pressure, not partnership.
The message is blunt, if the system is closing in, Iraq will harden rather than bend.
𝐓𝐞𝐡𝐫𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐬 𝐒𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐜 𝐃𝐞𝐩𝐭𝐡: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐔𝐦𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐋𝐢𝐧𝐤
For Iraq’s Shiite political class, Iran is no longer merely an ally or a neighbor. It has become strategic depth, a historical insurance policy against exclusion, fragmentation, and reversal.
This bond is not ideological alone. It is existential.
The memory of marginalization before 2003 still governs decision-making. Tehran represents continuity, protection, and leverage in a region that has repeatedly punished Iraqi Shiite power when it stood alone. In this calculus, the collapse of the Iranian state is not a foreign crisis, it is an Iraqi one.
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐫 𝐚𝐬 𝐖𝐞𝐚𝐩𝐨𝐧: 𝐀𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚’𝐬 𝐀𝐥𝐠𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐦𝐢𝐜 𝐎𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧
The adversary Baghdad now fears most does not arrive with tanks or drones.
It arrives with spreadsheets.
Over the past year, Washington has perfected a strategy of financial containment.
Iraq’s oil revenues, held at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, have become leverage points.
The dismantling of the dollar auction system in early 2025 and the enforcement of intrusive “know your customer” regimes across state payrolls have effectively placed Iraq’s economy under digital supervision.
To many in Baghdad, this is not reform. It is financial trusteeship.
The result is a slow, suffocating erosion of sovereignty, an occupation without soldiers, enforced by code.
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐂𝐡𝐨𝐢𝐜𝐞: 𝐒𝐮𝐛𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐫 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐨𝐥𝐭
Iraq now faces a stark equation:
- Accept permanent subordination to a dollar-centric financial order
- Or revolt, knowing the cost may be economic devastation
Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani attempted to delay this reckoning, balancing Tehran’s demands with Washington’s red lines. Maliki’s return signals that this balancing act has failed.
The era of maneuver is closing. The era of decision has arrived.
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐋𝐨𝐠𝐢𝐜: 𝐏𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐮𝐭𝐨𝐧𝐨𝐦𝐲
A strongman is not chosen to negotiate hardship away, but to endure it.
The Shiite Coordination Framework appears to be betting that collective identity, historical memory, and regional alignment can absorb economic shock in exchange for political independence. Sanctions, currency stress, and isolation are being reframed not as failures, but as rites of passage toward true sovereignty.
This is a dangerous wager. But to its architects, it is the only remaining one.
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐎𝐢𝐥 𝐖𝐞𝐚𝐩𝐨𝐧: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐓𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐚 𝐒𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧
With 90 percent of state revenue tied to oil exports, Iraq’s ultimate countermeasure is also its most self-destructive.
Analysts tracking regional escalation point to a rapidly rising “revenge coefficient” following the confrontations of 2025. In this climate, the once-unthinkable scenario, a suspension of oil exports to Western markets as a form of counter-sanction, is now openly discussed in elite circles.
Current estimates place the probability of a direct sovereign collision at 82 percent in the first half of the year.
If that line is crossed, Iraq would not merely challenge the system. It would detonate inside it.
𝐂𝐡𝐞𝐜𝐤, 𝐨𝐫 𝐂𝐡𝐞𝐜𝐤𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐞
As the Federal Reserve scrutinizes balances and Tehran secures corridors, Baghdad stands exposed, caught between liquidity and loyalty, between survival and submission.
The Iranian chess move has been played. The strongman has returned.
Now the question is no longer whether Iraq can live comfortably within the international system, but whether it is prepared to die politically outside of it.
History suggests that when sovereignty is cornered, nations rarely choose quietly.
They choose loudly.
posted by Satish Sharma at
13:22
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home