Why did the Guardian not run such an important article by one of its biggest-name writers? Is the answer that what Jones reveals about the BBC's editorial manipulations – presenting Israel in the best light possible – applies to the Guardian too?
https://x.com/Jonathan_K_Cook/status/1870067657380147404
Owen Jones does a long investigation detailing how the BBC intentionally skews its coverage of Gaza to obscure Israel's genocidal crimes there. His paper, the Guardian, has slots, including the Long Read, for precisely such work. Yet the Guardian doesn't publish Jones' piece.
Instead, he has to take it to an online site, and cover his own costs, of £20,000, to legal the article.
Why did the Guardian not run such an important article by one of its biggest-name writers?
Is the answer that what Jones reveals about the BBC's editorial manipulations – presenting Israel in the best light possible – applies to the Guardian too?
That just as at the BBC, there are parts of the Guardian newsroom in near-revolt at their outlet's complicity in genocide?
That Israel's narrative enforcer at the BBC, Raffi Berg, has a counterpart at the Guardian named Jonathan Freedland?
Is the problem that Jones' article is a little too close to the bone for the Guardian?
You can read Jones' shocking investigation into how the BBC actively colluded in concealing the Gaza genocide here:
dropsitenews.com/p/bbc-civil-wa
posted by Satish Sharma at
01:12
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home