One side speaks of confronting armed occupation forces on the battlefield. The other openly debates collective punishment,
https://x.com/Marwa__Osman/status/2058849966932545755
#BREAKING
While the Resistance in Lebanon targets occupation soldiers and military assets, Israel's political and military leadership is openly discussing something very different.
Israeli entity Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich reportedly proposed demolishing ten residential buildings in the capital Beirut's southern suburbs for every explosive drone launched by Hezbollah. Meanwhile, Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir argued that Israel can no longer "work with tweezers" and called for a new equation that includes striking buildings in Beirut and Tyre as a means of deterrence.
This is the difference laid bare.
One side speaks of confronting armed occupation forces on the battlefield. The other openly debates collective punishment, threatening entire neighborhoods and civilian infrastructure because it is failing to impose its will through military force.
When Israel cannot secure decisive victories against fighters, they often turn their anger toward civilians. There is a scientific name for this behavior: terror as policy.
The more frustrated the occupation becomes on the battlefield, the more openly its leaders reveal their willingness to punish innocent people for what they cannot achieve against armed resistance.
A classic display of a colonial mindset: unable to break the fighters, it threatens the families, the homes, and the cities.
Diabolical. Criminal. And increasingly impossible to hide.
posted by Satish Sharma at
03:19
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home