"To be honest, if you’re not in the Epstein files, it would be an insult. Because it just means that you were a bit of a loser."
https://x.com/nxt888/status/2020204691100168515
Victoria Hervey is useful, but not for the reason she thinks.
She just told you the truth of that world in one sentence:
"To be honest, if you’re not in the Epstein files, it would be an insult. Because it just means that you were a bit of a loser."
Read that again.
She is not horrified that Epstein "knew everybody that was very powerful."
She is horrified at the idea of not being invited.
For her, the shame is not proximity to a trafficker.
The shame is being left off the list.
That is the entire psychology of the Western elite, stripped of PR:
Status over innocence.
Access over ethics.
Clout over conscience.
Epstein was not an "accident" in that scene.
He was the perfect concierge.
He curated a social hierarchy where the real currency was what you were willing to ignore:
The girls too young.
The favors too dirty.
The money too unexplained.
And now you have someone from inside that circle all but admitting it:
Being in the orbit of a predator was a mark of success.
Being untouched by that network made you "a loser."
It is almost pure.
They have inverted morality so completely that distance from a child trafficker is now low status.
That is why I wrote what I wrote:
The Epstein files will give you everything except power.
Names. Dates. Sin. Spectacle.
What they will not give you is the culture that produced someone who can say this on camera and still feel like the victim is the person not on the flight log.
You are not meant to look at that sentence and ask:
"What kind of system makes people think like this?"
You are meant to laugh, gossip, and move on.
In a healthy society, being in Epstein’s files would end your career.
In theirs, it meant you were finally somebody.
posted by Satish Sharma at
04:58
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home