Washington’s endgame may not be Libya/Syria-style state collapse. What the empire prefers is behavioral change: keeping the Iranian state intact while reshaping its geopolitical posture.
https://x.com/KevorkAlmassian/status/2011196511816942016
US aggression on Iran is being reported as “imminent” again, and the propaganda machine is already in overdrive: wall-to-wall hysteria, selective leaks, and the usual moral theater designed to make war feel inevitable.
Before you buy the script, watch this.
In this video, I lay out a different hypothesis: Washington’s endgame may not be Libya/Syria-style state collapse. What the empire prefers is behavioral change: keeping the Iranian state intact while reshaping its geopolitical posture.
Why now? Because after Syria's fall, the regional balance shifted. Iran’s “axis of resistance” lost its geographic backbone, while Turkey’s influence is expanding across Syria, Iraq, and the South Caucasus, especially after Azerbaijan’s victory in Nagorno-Karabakh. A pan-Turkic arc is forming, and Washington does not want any single dominant power in Eurasia.
That creates an incentive structure: the US may still “need” Iran, but not revolutionary Iran, rather a more nationalist, managerial Iran that can counterweigh Turkey’s rise.
I’m not claiming this is going to happen. I’m saying this is how the empire behaves when it wants outcomes without occupation, without responsibility, and without uncontrollable blowback.
If you want geopolitics without the childish good-guy/bad-guy framing — if you want to read between the lines and cut through the anti-Iran propaganda war — this is for you.
posted by Satish Sharma at
07:11
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home