You say Zionism "requires survival." Fine. Then answer this: Survival where?
https://x.com/nxt888/status/1992574748862423397
You keep reciting a century of violence as if it happened in a vacuum, and then you call that history. That is the trick.
You list every reaction and erase every cause.
You say Zionism "requires survival."
Fine.
Then answer this:
Survival where?
On whose land?
At whose expense?
Under whose consent?
Because every example you cite, every bomb, every attack, every atrocity, happened after a movement arrived with the explicit goal of replacing one population with another.
You call that security.
The people who were displaced call it something else.
Let us lay out the order you keep avoiding:
1. Zionism arrives with a project of demographic replacement.
2. Indigenous people resist that project.
3. Israel calls the resistance "unprovoked hostility."
4. Every retaliation becomes the justification for more land seizures.
5. More seizures produce more resistance.
6. The cycle is blamed entirely on the colonized.
You pretend that everything begins at step 3.
That is the intellectual fraud at the heart of your argument.
You say walls were built after terror.
False.
Walls were built after land was partitioned and occupied.
Terror grew after a people were fragmented, blockaded, and suffocated.
You say checkpoints came after bombs.
False again.
Checkpoints came after a military occupation that denied millions basic civil rights for decades.
You list massacres against Israelis.
You omit the massacres Israel committed long before a single rocket existed:
Deir Yassin. Lydda. Dawaymeh. Abu Shusha. Al-Bassa. Al-Dawahirah. Saliha. Eilabun. Safsaf. Tantura. Kafr Qasim.
Events not written by Hamas propaganda but recorded by Israeli historians.
You say "Zionism is a response."
No.
Zionism is a project.
Resistance is the response.
And if this project is truly about "survival," then answer this:
Why does Israel require the strongest impunity machine on earth to maintain it?
You say Israel "doesn’t need American vetoes."
Then why does the U.S. veto every attempt to hold Israel accountable, more than for any other country in UN history?
If Israel didn’t need that shield, Washington wouldn’t have to raise it every time.
A state with nuclear weapons, F-35s, the Iron Dome, and the full protection of the world’s biggest superpower does not behave this way out of "survival."
It behaves this way because it knows it will never face consequences.
You accuse anti-Zionists of ignoring history.
No.
We refuse to start history at the moment that flatters your narrative.
Here is the truth you keep burying under slogans:
A movement that was explicitly built on exclusion, partition, transfer, and demographic engineering will always call the people resisting it "terrorists."
Empire always frames the indigenous as the aggressor.
You invoke 1920–1948 maps.
Let’s open them together:
Who owned the land?
Who had the deeds?
Who built the villages?
Who planted the olive trees?
Who had the demographic majority in every district except Jaffa?
Hint: It was not the movement arriving from Europe with a flag, a militia, and a blueprint.
And here is the part of your argument that collapses completely:
If Zionism is a "necessity," why does it require permanent military rule over millions of people who did not vote for it, consent to it, or benefit from it?
Necessity does not require apartheid.
Necessity does not require settlements.
Necessity does not require ethnic cleansing.
Only domination does.
So let me fix your final line properly:
If you are a Zionist, there is something deeply wrong with what you must erase:
The people, the villages, the history, the maps, the expulsions, the laws, the checkpoints, the blockades, the dead, and the living truth that none of this began with rockets.
It began with replacement.
posted by Satish Sharma at
01:12
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home