Now back to the “non-binding” intellectual deception: • ICJ advisory opinions = supreme interpretation of binding law (law binds by definition, obviously).
Now back to the “non-binding” intellectual deception:
• ICJ advisory opinions = supreme interpretation of binding law (law binds by definition, obviously).
• States already bound by treaties & custom, with or without the opinion.
• ICJ doesn't create duties, just spells them out authoritatively (for states pretending they don't get it).

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home