There is clear evidence that Kirk was beginning to seriously question Israel and its actions in the weeks/months before his assassination.
Michael I do not know who killed Kirk, but I do know this: There is clear evidence that Kirk was beginning to seriously question Israel and its actions in the weeks/months before his assassination.
Look up the clips, you're a reporter.
He is the head and face of an organization with MASSIVE influence in the exact demographic that is turning away from Israel (conservatives under 40 - have a look at both Pew and Gallup polls from the spring).
Israel is desperate to somehow regain that demographic or its goose is cooked in just a few years as the boomers die out.
Charlie was their ticket. But he started turning. He started questioning things that cannot be questioned, like Oct 7th.
Does Israel claim the right to assassinate anyone, anywhere in the world, that it deems a threat? Openly.
Have they acted on that "right" consistently? Yes. Including just this week in Doha.
Is a Charlie Kirk who is no longer reflexively pro-Israel a threat to Israel's continued existence? I think we both know that answer.
I don't know who did it, but to dismiss all of this (and more) out of hand strikes me as surprising for someone of your inquisitive mind.
posted by Satish Sharma at
13:13
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home