Because the genocide of the Aboriginal people in Australia succeeded, you think that makes it legitimate. Because Native Americans were slaughtered and erased, America is now "valid."
https://x.com/nxt888/status/1970074149893619744
So let me understand you, "John."
Because the genocide of the Aboriginal people in Australia succeeded, you think that makes it legitimate.
Because Native Americans were slaughtered and erased, America is now "valid."
And by that same logic, if Israel finishes its genocide, Palestine will magically vanish and history will applaud.
Do you hear what you are admitting?
That the measure of legitimacy is not justice but extermination.
That if a people are slaughtered long enough, their killers inherit the land.
By that logic, the gas chambers of Europe were not a crime.
They were simply history "building a country."
Is that what you want to stand on?
That genocide is not an evil to resist but a blueprint to repeat?
The Palestinians are fighting because they refuse to become another "success story" of erasure.
And their refusal exposes the obscenity of your argument:
That you want the world to accept their destruction as normal,
Simply because other genocides were not stopped in time.
History does not absolve you.
It condemns you twice.
Once for the crime itself.
And once more for trying to make crime into precedent.
posted by Satish Sharma at
02:17
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home