Urban warfare? You mean the kind where one side drops 2,000-pound bombs on apartments, hospitals, and refugee camps from U.S.-funded F-16s?
Urban warfare?
You mean the kind where one side drops 2,000-pound bombs on apartments, hospitals, and refugee camps from U.S.-funded F-16s?
Where the most advanced surveillance state in the world claims it "accidentally" kills thousands of children it already scanned, tracked, and targeted?
Where one side wears body armor and the other carries their siblings’ remains in plastic bags?
You throw around "urban warfare" like it’s some moral shield.
As if murdering children becomes noble once it’s done with precision.
Tell me, Mark.
How many babies have to die before you consider it "effective"?
How many massacres make it "strategic"?
You think you’re explaining the battlefield.
But what you’re really doing is confessing.
Because only someone who’s lost all moral bearing can look at a slaughtered child and say,
"Well, that’s just urban combat."
You don’t understand war.
You understand sanitized atrocity.
You don’t sound informed.
You sound desensitized.
And the worst part?
You think that makes you wise.
posted by Satish Sharma at
04:38
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home