The numbers don’t just tell a story. They reveal a crime in plain sight. In what world is it justice to dispossess the native majority, hand their land to the settler minority, and then call that a "peace plan"?
https://x.com/nxt888/status/1944408310142369855
Karl, you’re right. There was disproportionality. And it wasn’t minor. It was foundational.
A settler minority that owned 7% of the land was awarded 55.5% of the territory.
Palestinians made up more than two-thirds of the population in 1947.
They owned 93% of the land.
But the UN handed most of it to a minority that made up less than one-third of the population and held only a fraction of the ownership.
The numbers don’t just tell a story. They reveal a crime in plain sight.
In what world is it justice to dispossess the native majority, hand their land to the settler minority, and then call that a "peace plan"?
Even within the borders of the so-called "Jewish state," nearly half the population would have still been Palestinian.
That is not a homeland. That is a blueprint for domination.
And that is exactly what followed.
Villages erased. Families expelled. A nation fractured and renamed by those who insisted that justice meant submission and survival meant silence.
The partition was never a compromise. It was an ultimatum in diplomatic disguise.
It was ethnic cleansing, pre-approved by paperwork.
And Palestinians were right to refuse. Just as any people would refuse to be carved apart, displaced, and renamed for the comfort of someone else's nationalism.
To accept that map was to accept their own erasure.
They chose dignity instead.
And they were right to do so.
posted by Satish Sharma at
14:58
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home