Q: Speaking of the rules-based order that you say you’re defending, ICC issued warrants for 🇮🇱 officials for crimes against humanity, will you rethink your support Singh: The US rejects the decision
https://x.com/AssalRad/status/1859695413802172552
Watch question Pentagon on ICC warrants.
Q: Speaking of the rules-based order that you say you’re defending, ICC issued warrants for 
officials for crimes against humanity, will you rethink your support
Singh: The US rejects the decision
Q: You’re rejecting it based on technicalities and jurisdiction, what about the allegations
Singh: We don’t see eye to eye
Q: So what is the legal opinion you’re basing your rejection on
Singh: I’m not aware of a formal legal opinion…We take it so seriously that we installed a maritime corridor
Q: So if you don’t have a legal assessment, how can you reject it
Singh: We reject the Court’s decision, that doesn’t mean it had to go through a legal process
officials for crimes against humanity, will you rethink your support
Singh: The US rejects the decision
Q: You’re rejecting it based on technicalities and jurisdiction, what about the allegations
Singh: We don’t see eye to eye
Q: So what is the legal opinion you’re basing your rejection on
Singh: I’m not aware of a formal legal opinion…We take it so seriously that we installed a maritime corridor
Q: So if you don’t have a legal assessment, how can you reject it
Singh: We reject the Court’s decision, that doesn’t mean it had to go through a legal process
posted by Satish Sharma at
06:54
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home