A World Without Artworks That Auction Off for $80 Million?

 

by Sam Pizzigati

Three Skulls by Paul Cezanne. (Detroit Institute of the Arts). Photo: Jeffrey St. Clair.

Fine art has been a wonderful vehicle for “wealth signaling among the ultra-rich,” the Duke University sociologist Lisa Keister recently noted, ever since ancient times. The latest twist on that signaling? Billionaires are now commissioning giant statues of their nearest and dearest.

Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook fame has just unveiled a seven-foot tall statute of his wife. Amazon’s Jeff Bezos last year attached a wooden likeness of his fiancée onto the prow of the Koru, his $500-million yacht. Such “public displays of affection among the ultra-wealthy,” observes Keister, have ensconced them squarely within “the realm of grandeur and extravagance.”

Other super-rich souls, instead of going big with their fine art, are going sort of tiny. Their reason? The mega-million-dollar paintings they’re buying up at auctions are now regularly going straight into high-security vaults. With their prized paintings locked away, how can the super rich impress their pals? Simple. They’re showing off little jpegs of their prized purchases, marvels veteran art dealer Michael Findlay, on their mobile phones. Mission accomplished! Status confirmed!

Status among rich art collectors these days doesn’t come cheap. The second-most expensive painting sold last year at auction, Gustav Klimt’s 1917 Lady with a Fan, ended up going for $80 million, “nearly 10 times,” the Art News reports, what the painting went for at its last auction sale in 1994.

For the ultra-wealthy, the ongoing run-up in fine-art prices amounts to no big deal. They can, after all, easily afford anything that tickles their souls. Anything, they would have us believe, with one exception: taxes on their fortunes.

Any taxes that governments might dare to levy on the wealth of the wealthy, the lackeys of our deepest pockets insist at every opportunity, would leave our richest with no choice but to pick up their marbles and move to some rich people-friendly locale that at tax time gives due deference to grand fortunes.

This case against taxing grand fortune may be beginning to wear a little thin. The current Spanish government actually now has in place a new tax on concentrated wealth. Spaniards with net worths over 3 million euros, the equivalent of about $2.9 million, faced last year and will face again this year a temporary wealth tax.

This new levy ranges from a tax rate of 1.7 percent on private fortune between $2.9 million and $4.8 million to a 3.5 percent tax rate on stashes of wealth over $9.6 million. Proceeds from this new “solidarity” tax, Spanish finance minister María Jesús Montero has announced, will help “guarantee social justice and economic efficiency.”

“Those who have more,” as Spanish prime minister Pedro Sánchez likes to put it, “should contribute more.”

And if all our planet’s astonishingly well-endowed have-mores did pay more, how much in new revenue would the world have available for improving the lives of our non-super rich?

The UK-based Tax Justice Network has taken a crack at an answer. The Network’s researchers have just released a report that estimates how much Spanish-style wealth taxes, if adopted worldwide, could annually raise. That total turns out to be rather significant.

The world’s nations, the Tax Justice Network calculates, could raise $2.1 trillion a year “by following the example of Spain’s successful wealth tax” on their own richest 0.5 percent.

How could so much be raised from so few? The top 0.5 percent, the new Tax Justice Network analysis details, hold a wildly disproportionate share of the world’s wealth. On average, the bottom 50 percent of national adult populations hold just 3 percent of national wealth. The share of national wealth that goes to the top 0.5 percent? That averages out to 25.7 percent.

In the United States, according to the World Inequality Database, the top 0.5 percent of the adult population holds an average fortune of $29.3 million. Entering the top 0.5 percent takes a fortune worth almost $8.6 million.

The United States also currently hosts nine of the ten richest men on the planet, with Elon Musk sitting on top of that list. His personal fortune is hovering near to a quarter-trillion dollars.

The Tax Justice Network’s Mark Bou Mansour may have the most vivid take on that stunning stat.

“The average U.S. worker,” he points out, “would have to work for a stretch of time 13 times longer than humans have existed to earn as much as wealth as the world’s richest man has today.”

We won’t eliminate, to be sure, that outrageous gap with a wealth tax as modest as Spain has placed on the world’s policy-making table. But kudos to Spain anyway. We have to start somewhere.

And kudos to the folks at the Tax Justice Network as well. They’ve combined their ace number-crunching with a clever and colorful new step-by-step guide on how to tax the super rich. Take a look. We can do this!

Sam Pizzigati writes on inequality for the Institute for Policy Studies. His latest book: The Case for a Maximum Wage (Polity). Among his other books on maldistributed income and wealth: The Rich Don’t Always Win: The Forgotten Triumph over Plutocracy that Created the American Middle Class, 1900-1970  (Seven Stories Press).           

 https://www.counterpunch.org/2024/08/26/a-world-without-artworks-that-auction-off-for-80-million/