War averted as Russia & Turkey reach deal on Idlib… but is peace on horizon?

6 Mar, 2020 14:14 / Updated 29 minutes ago

Get short URL

FILE PHOTO: Russian (front) and Turkish military vehicles drive on a joint patrol in Syria's north-eastern Hasakeh province on November 1, 2019. ©  AFP / Delil Souleiman 

After a new agreement with Russia dispelled the specter of a major conflict arising from the recent escalation of tensions in Syria's Idlib, RT finds out whether it will be a lasting solution for Ankara and Damascus.

Damascus had launched an offensive in the northwestern province of Idlib against armed groups, which Ankara had supported as well as launching a military operation of its own. However, a heated standoff between the Syrian Army and Turkey seems to have been avoided. This was all thanks to the diplomatic efforts of Moscow and Ankara, which led to a new agreement on the troubled province following nearly six hours of negotiations on Thursday.

The conflict had threatened to spiral out of control at any minute, dragging both adversaries – as well as Syria's allies in Moscow and possibly even Turkey's NATO partners – into an all-out war.

ALSO ON RT.COMIdlib ceasefire: Putin & Erdogan reach deal on Syria de-escalation after marathon Moscow talks

Every side got what it wanted

The deal appears to do even more than prevent a war, since pretty much every side involved in the latest flare-up achieved most of its goals, short-term ones, at least. For Moscow, averting the disaster was a victory in itself, Vitaly Naumkin, president of the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, told RT.

"The primary goal that… meets Russia's interests is putting an end to the fighting and removing a threat of a major war that could break out between Damascus and Ankara, in which Russia could end up being involved," he said.

Turkey's commitment to fighting terrorists in Syria also plays into Moscow's hands since Ankara agrees to something that Russia has been calling for all along. "The mere fact of such support imposes certain obligations on the Turkish side," Naumkin noted.

Turkey also "gets what it wants: a northern Idlib buffer zone, where it can deal with internally displaced persons and refugees to make sure they're not crossing into its territory," Aleksey Khlebnikov, a Middle East expert at the Moscow Carnegie Center, said.

ALSO ON RT.COMStress test passed: Russia and Turkey continue to work in Syria

Besides, a new ceasefire means that the Syrian Army would not continue its offensive against the Turkish-backed militants, potentially pushing them away to the Turkish territory as well and Ankara does not need to intervene.

Damascus, which was not part of the talks in Moscow on Thursday, still had its interests preserved. The Syrian Army retained control over the territories it seized during the latest offensive, including the strategic M5 highway connecting the Syrian capital to the nation's second most populous city of Aleppo.

Another strategic road – the M4 highway linking Aleppo to the coastal province of Latakia – will now be patrolled by Russian and Turkish forces, providing a way for its reopening as well.

"Reopening the M4 and M5 was basically envisioned by the 2018 agreement [between Moscow and Ankara], but it never happened, so now Russia finally pushed Turkey to accept that," Khlebnikov noted, adding that it apparently was the primary strategic goal of Damascus and its allies in Moscow since the two roads "are essential for Syrian economic revival."

A map of Syria's Idlib province showing the security corridor, which is to be established under the agreement between Moscow and Ankara. © RT

Rebuilding trust

The decision to create a security corridor along the M4 highway and the plans to deploy joint Turkish-Russian military patrols in the area might also be crucial for maintaining security in the area and avoiding further bloodshed, the analysts believe.

"That requires a certain level of trust and that means that trust is being rebuilt," Naumkin said. "We need to reduce the level of tension stirred up by the forces seeking to undermine the partnership between the two nations."