Iran and west - great leap forward in Geneva ?

Iran and west to begin drafting nuclear deal after great leap forward in Geneva

Iran's foreign minister says he believes 'ingredients are there' for historic breakthrough after decade of diplomatic sparring

Saeed Kamali Dehghan and Julian Borger in Geneva

Iranian and western officials will start drafting a nuclear agreement in Geneva on Friday after significant progress in international negotiations, Iran's foreign minister has told the Guardian.

Speaking during a break in the talks, Mohammad Javad Zarif said it was quite possible the agreement would be finished by the end of Friday, but that much would rely on the contribution on western diplomats.

"Depending on what they put on paper with us, we can decide whether it's a major deal or a small step in the right direction. I hope its more than a small step in the right direction, but I'll be happy if we move in the right direction," Zarif said.

An agreement on any scale would represent a historic breakthrough after a decade of diplomatic sparring marked by paralysis and distrust.

Zarif said the process of drafting would begin on Friday morning at a meeting with the EU foreign policy chief, Lady Ashton, who acts as a convenor for the six world powers with delegations in Geneva: the US, UK, France, Germany, Russia and China.

"I believe the ingredients are there. I believe there is a general understanding of everyone involved, but it is important at the same time to start doing things in black and white and try to move forward with the text," Zarif said.

The two days of talks in Geneva brought together Iran and six global powers to discuss the future of Iran's nuclear programme. Western officials agreed that drafting work could begin on Saturday, but cautioned there were still many difficult issues to resolve.

Zarif said the six other nations represented in Geneva had agreed with an Iranian plan to move the negotiations forward – a statement of intent encompassing an initial confidence-building measure, and an outline of the end goal of a comprehensive agreement on the Iranian nuclear programme and a normalisation of relations between Tehran and the west.

The foreign minister said the negotiations had gone further in the first day than agreeing a framework.

"We have gone beyond that and we have agreed on the elements that have to be incorporated in each one of these [steps]. The manner in which we incorporate them and the balance we strike between these elements – that's the sort of questions we have to answer tomorrow," he said.

It is widely expected that both an interim deal and a longer-term settlement would involve western acceptance of Iran's enrichment programme in return for Iranian acceptance of limits of its scope, particularly a cap on the level to which it could enrich uranium of about 5%, sufficient for fuel for nuclear power stations.

There would also have to be an agreement on how far Iran could go in developing a heavy-water reactor at Arak which would produce plutonium, and on Iranian acceptance of extensive and intrusive inspections by the international watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

As the negotiations were underway in Geneva, the Israeli prime minister,Binyamin Netanyahu, had been warning against a partial agreement that left the Iranian nuclear programme in place.

He said: "I believe adopting the proposals is a mistake of historic proportions. They must be rejected outright."

Asked about Netanyahu's comments, Zarif said: "I don't think he's an authority on mistakes because he's been making mistakes for his entire life.

"He's been calling the Iranian programme six months away from a nuclear weapon since 1991, so I don't consider him a credible authority."

On the reception a nuclear bargain is likely to receive back in Iran, the foreign minister said: "It depends on the type of deal that we get.

"The Iranian public is very sceptical about the process and I believe rightly so because we haven't had a very positive experience in the past.

"What is important is to prepare a solid agreement that all sides can be happy with and all sides can sell to their populations.

"For Iran because its our right. Its our programme, it is important that it is respectful and it is based on equal footing and I believe we can sell it to the public. If we can't, I don't think we should agree to it."

Zarif is not the only participant in the Geneva talks likely to face resistance back home. In Washington on Thursday, the US Senate, said it would move ahead with a debate on tough new sanctions on Iran after the Geneva meeting was over.

Some senators have said they would consider loosening the sanctions regime, but only in return for dramatic concessions from Tehran.

In another sign of progress, Zarif said the head of the IAEA, Yukiya Amano, would visit Tehran on Monday, raising expectations of a breakthrough in long-running talks between the Iranian government and the agency aimed at clearing up uncertainty over Iran's past development work on nuclear weapons.

Zarif said: "Mr Amano's visit is going to be an important indication that we are in process in moving forward."

His optimistic remarks followed a full meeting of all the delegates and then separate discussions between Iranian officials with the diplomats from the US, Russia and China, and one with the three European states represented, the UK, France and Germany.

British and Iranian diplomats discussed the eventual appointment of non-resident charges d'affaires in each other's countries.

Zarif had cancelled a trip to Rome so he could hold a face-to-face meeting with Ashton as it became clear that substantial progress was being made.

"In response to a first step agreed to by Iran that halts their programme from advancing further, we are prepared to offer limited, targeted, and reversible sanctions relief," a senior US official said before the talks began.

"We are not talking about touching the core architecture of the Iranian sanctions regime in this first step in any way.

"And if Iran does not live up to its obligations under the initial understanding, or if we cannot get a comprehensive agreement finalised, any economic relief we will have given Iran can, in fact, be reversed."

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/07/iran-and-west-drafting-nuclear-agreement