Wednesday 18 October 2017

Major Taliban Attacks Kill at Least 74 Across Afghanistan

Attacks Target Police Compounds, Training Sites


Jason Ditz 


Major Taliban attacks were carried out in both the Paktia and Ghazni Provinces on Tuesday, killing at least 74 people, mostly police. The attacks targeted police compounds and other government sites.

The largest attack hit a police compound in the Paktia capital of Gardez, killing 41 people, and wounding 158 people, including 110 civilians. The attack involved two car bombings, and five other attacks with suicide belts.

Among the slain were several civilians, but also the Paktia provincial police chief Toryali Abdiani. The large number of wounded civilians were mostly students there to pick up university ID cards.

Taliban attackers in Ghazni used major armored vehicles full of explosives to attack police near the capital building. Death tolls are still a matter of dispute, with Afghan officials putting it around 33, while the Taliban claimed 44 police slain in the attack.

http://news.antiwar.com/2017/10/17/major-taliban-attacks-kill-at-least-74-across-afghanistan/

Syrian Kurds Declare Victory in Raqqa, But Face Complicated Peace

Ruling Major Arab City Will Be a Tall Order in the Long Term


Jason Ditz 


On Tuesday, the Kurdish YPG declared victory in the ISIS capital city of Raqqa, declaring the city to have been “liberated,” and leaving ISIS forces retreating further east, trying to set up defenses elsewhere.

It was a big victory that was a year in the making, but the future of Kurdish-held Raqqa could be an even more complex matter, as it leaves Kurdish officials and some very tiny Arab allies governing a major Arab-dominated city.

Placing their Arab allies into positions of visible power is likely, to try to tone down the impression of the city being Kurdish-occupied. Still, there’s no denying that many of these factions only allied with the YPG in the first place to try to get such positions in the end, and may be seen by locals who preferred ISIS rule as collaborators.

The capture of Raqqa also greatly complicates the YPG’s goal of federalization within Syria, as it puts even more territory under the control of their regional government, which is claiming autonomy within a future Syria. That autonomy may be a tough sell if the Kurdish region is both this large and includes this many non-Kurds.


http://news.antiwar.com/2017/10/17/syrian-kurds-declare-victory-in-raqqa-but-face-complicated-peace/

Pentagon May Stop Training Iraqis Amid Kurdish Conflict

US 'Considering Options' as Fighting Escalates


Jason Ditz 


Just one day after Pentagon officials declared the fighting in Kirkuk Province a misunderstanding, officials are warning that the US might totally halt arming and training the Iraqi military if they continue to press their offensive against Iraqi Kurdistan.

The offensive is part of an attempt by the Iraqi government to stop Kurdish secession after a September referendum in which over 92% of voters approved the measure. So far Iraqi forces have been pushing into territory the Kurds took during the ISIS War.

There hasn’t been much direct fighting so far, but Pentagon officials reported that exchanges of artillery fire and some limited exchanges between Iraqi forces, their Shi’ite militias, and the Kurdish Peshmerga have killed at least 11 people.

Iraqi Prime Minister Hayder Abadi has presented the offensive as the end of Kurdistan’s secession vote, while Kurdish leaders have said it amounts to a declaration of war. Apparently sensing this could be the start of something bigger, US officials have been quietly backing away from the situation.

In practice though, these are two US-armed and trained armies setting up battle lines for a war, and while US officials insist they’d prefer to just continue fighting ISIS, everyone but the US has been predicting this war would immediately follow the ISIS war, and indeed it appears to have.


http://news.antiwar.com/2017/10/17/pentagon-may-stop-training-iraqis-amid-kurdish-conflict/

Kurdish Forces Abandon Territory In Face of Iraqi Offensive

Kurds Lose More Oilfields, Towns Along Periphery of Iraqi Kurdistan


Jason Ditz 


While fighting has been limited in Iraqi Kurdistan so far, the losses continue to pile up for the Kurdish Peshmerga forces, as they continue to retreat in the face of an aggressive offensive by the Iraqi military into contested parts of Kurdish territory.

On Monday, this saw Iraq seizing Kirkuk with barely a shot fired. Tuesday, Iraq seized more oil fields near Kirkuk, and also the important towns of Khanaqin and Sinjar. There were reports of some exchanges of artillery fire, and potentially as many as 11 killed.

The territory seized includes areas with Kurdish and Yazidi populations, but which are outside of the official Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) area. It’s not clear yet if Iraq’s offensive, intended to stop Kurdish secession, will also include a push into KRG territory.

Iraqi Prime Minister Hayder Abadi seems to believe that the point has already been proven, declaring last month’s referendum “finished and has become a thing of the past.” 92% of Kurds voted in favor of declaring independence from Iraq, and that’s an ambition that’s not likely to disappear just because of a single military push.

Kurdish President Massoud Barzani maintains that the referendum “won’t be in vain,” though it isn’t clear what their next move will be, having lost territory, and seeing their airports and border crossings closed.

http://news.antiwar.com/2017/10/17/peshmerga-abandons-territory-in-face-of-iraqi-offensive/

US sanctions bill vs Russia built on fraudster's political lobbying – Russian lawyer Veselnitskaya


US sanctions bill vs Russia built on fraudster's political lobbying – Russian lawyer Veselnitskaya
Natalya Veselnitskaya, dubbed a "Kremlin lawyer" in the US media because of her meeting with President Trump's son, has told RT that the Magnitsky Act against Russian officials came about as the result of a fraudulent investor's political maneuvering.
A four-page memo Veselnitskaya brought to her meeting with Donald Trump Jr, dated May 2016, was published in full by Foreign Policy magazine on Monday. Previously, CNN had cited excerpts from the Russian lawyer's talking points.
Veselnitskaya confirmed to RT the authenticity of the memo, saying that she was the one who gave it to the media.
“I personally gave this memo to the journalist, I can’t recall her name, this is the translation that I prepared for myself before my trip to the US last year,” she said.
The four-page analysis focuses on the backstory of the Magnitsky Act, a bill that allows the US to seize assets from Russians accused of human rights abuses and bar them from entering the country.
Veselnitskaya claims that it was a result of “a massive three-year lobbying campaign” driven by the CEO and founder of the Hermitage Capital fund, Bill Browder, “a fugitive criminal accused of tax fraud in Russia.”
By adopting the legislation in December 2012, the US lawmakers promoted “the never-existent story of a ‘lawyer,’ Sergey Magnitisky, who allegedly exposed corruption crimes and embezzlement from the Russian treasury, for which he was arrested, tortured and beaten to death,” she wrote.
 
According to her investigation, the largest investor in the companies associated with Browder was ZIFF Brothers Fund, known for its close ties to Democrats. “It cannot be ruled out that they also financed the Hillary Clinton campaign,”Veselnitskaya wrote in the only reference to the last year’s presidential campaign that could be found in the memo.
Speaking to RT, Veselnitskaya stressed that “the only truth” about the Magnitsky case is the losses inflicted on the Russian state budget due to tax evasion and other illegal financial activities orchestrated by Browder and the fact of a tragic death of the tax accountant, used by Browder to champion his anti-Russian cause.
What happened in the US in 2012 was pure politics. There is nothing about the real story of Sergey Magnitsky,” she said, adding that she is interested in unveiling the truth about the Magnitsky Act because it affects her client, Denis Katsyv, owner of Prevezon Holdings, and not because she is on some campaign against anti-Russia sanctions.
“Just to make it clear, I was never against any sanctions because they don’t involve my client, but I am against manipulating facts. I am against how the authorities have not investigated the story behind the Magnitsky Act,” she said.
Magnitsky was a prime suspect in a tax evasion scheme when he died in a pre-trial detention center in 2009. Veselnitiskaya said that his death was the “climax” of Browder’s lobbying campaign. 
She went on to argue that Browder has been using the new spiraling anti-Russia hysteria in the US mainstream media to portray her as an agent of the Kremlin. 
“Browder is spinning a story of espionage, of a “Kremlin hand,” but those documents I have are the results of the investigation,” she said, adding that any information she obtains in the course of her own investigation she is sharing with Russian prosecutors and American lawyers.
Referring to the resemblance of her talking points to the data reportedly provided to Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R) by Russian officials this summer, Veselintskaya said that she did not see why the information exchange should point to some sort of conspiracy.  
“I’ve read this memo and I agree that there are some similar points. Even if Dana Rohrabacher received his memo at the Prosecutor General’s Office when he was in Russia, there is nothing extraordinary or criminal about that,” she said.
“In this memo, there are just facts. It doesn’t matter what language you write them in. It’s all the same.”
At the time of the report, Browder filed a complaint with the Treasury's Office of Foreign Asset Control, arguing that Rohrabacher had breached the US sanctions imposed on Russia by accepting materials from Russian officials.
Rohrabacher fired back, with his spokesman calling the disgraced financier “a billionaire tax exile” and alleging that Browder’s motive for the complaint is to conceal facts from the investigation.
"It may not be in the interest of some individuals for the Russian side of serious matters to be examined and evaluated. Attempts to intimidate a member of Congress not to look at both sides is suspicious in and of itself," he said.
Veselnitskaya, who was propelled into the US media spotlight after her meeting with Donald Trump Jr in June 2016 was made public, accused Browder of an attempt to manipulate the story by launching a disinformation campaign.
In July, Browder told the Senate Judiciary Committee that the meeting between Veselnitskaya and the US president’s son was focused on the repeal of sanctions, a claim Veselnitskaya vehemently denies, as well as her alleged collusion with the Russian authorities.

Ukraine has a Nazi problem and a Western media problem


Bryan MacDonald is an Irish journalist, who is based in Russia
Ukraine has a Nazi problem and a Western media problem
Last weekend saw Ukraine’s biggest Nazi march of modern times. Yet, the Western media and its numerous correspondents in Kiev completely ignored the story, even on social networks. This is as clear an example of press bias as you will ever encounter.
On Saturday night, up to 20,000 far-right radicals honored the 75th anniversary of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) – a paramilitary group led by Stepan Bandera, which actively collaborated with Hitler’s Germany. They brandished lit torches, smoke pellets, and flares as they chanted fascist slogans. And some participants openly gave Nazi salutes during the rally.
The leaders of the procession included Oleg Tyahnybok, an associate of US Senators John McCain and Chris Murphy, who has called for Ukraine to do more to halt the "criminal activities" of "organized Jewry.” He’s also demanded Ukrainian citizens should have their ethnic origins stamped in their passports.
Earlier in the day, Ukraine’s President Petro Poroshenko said the actions of the UPA fighters would always remain an “inspiration” and an example for future generations. This conduct included the slaughter of tens of thousands of Jews and Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia from 1943 to 1944.
So, we had a major Nazi gathering in a European capital and the only English language sources that show up in a Google News search are from RT, Sputnik, The Nation and a half-hearted seven-sentence ‘report’ by US state broadcaster RFE/RL, which meekly describes them as mere “nationalists.” That means there is nothing from CNN, the Guardian, the New York Times, Washington Post or the BBC, among the usual suspects who make every little protest in Russia headline news.

Clutching at straws

We all know the mainstream narrative by now. Ukraine can do little wrong, and Russia can hardly do anything right. However, in reality, both countries are remarkably similar, culturally, politically, linguistically and socially. And this is hardly a surprise, given both formed the two most populous parts of a union state for over seventy years and have historical associations going back to the ninth century.
However, there are a few fundamental differences these days. Ukraine has, in fits and starts, pursued a pro-Western course since the turn of the century, while Russia has preferred to position itself as an independent Eurasian power. Meanwhile, there is also a huge economic disparity, with Russian per capita GDP around three and a half times higher than the Ukrainian equivalent.
There’s another significant issue which divides the two countries. And that’s the official attitude to World War Two. Moscow sees itself as the successor of the victorious Soviet Union and Kiev, searching for a historical narrative of statehood, wants to project Ukraine as a victim of the USSR. This is despite the fact that many Ukrainians - such as Leonid Brezhnev, Konstantin Chernenko, Leon Trotsky and Grigory Zinoviev - played prominent political roles in the former superpower.
Today, Kiev airbrushes these figures from its history and instead prefers to celebrate people associated with the anti-Soviet resistance of the World War Two period. The problem is that most of these characters were Nazi collaborators, complicit in various atrocities of the period.
And that’s why we had Saturday night’s torchlight march in Kiev. An attempt to secure the Bandera gang’s place as the founding fathers of the modern Ukrainian nation. Something further encouraged by the post- Maidan regime’s 2014 decision to make October 14 - the UPA’s birthday - an official public holiday called "Defender of Ukraine Day.”

Willful ignorance

There are numerous Western correspondents in Kiev. Perhaps the most prominent is Christopher Miller, of RFE/RL, whose presence at Maidan gained him a substantial number of social media followers. On Saturday, Miller made no reference to the Nazi march on his Twitter account, preferring to post pictures from the Carpathian mountains. However, in the past, he has extensively tweeted about much smaller rallies organized by Alexei Navalny in far-away Moscow and St Petersburg.
Additionally, Matthew Kupfer, head of Hromadske in Kiev, a TV network funded by the US embassy and the European Commission, also failed to note the rally. But, again, he extensively covered Navalny’s travails in Russia. Meanwhile, in fairness to Ian Bateson, who writes from Ukraine for the New York Times and Guardian, he did at least mention the event, if not its intent, but, again, this contrasts with his enthusiastic tweeting about Russia’s opposition get-togethers.
As mentioned early, big media corporations, with a staff and stringer presence all over the former USSR, apparently didn't feel a Nazi parade, of up to 20,000 people, with fascist symbols and Hitler salutes on view, was newsworthy. Furthermore, when statues are erected to Ukrainians who murdered Jews these outlets don’t seem to bat an eyelid.
Take the BBC, for instance. The British state broadcaster has a dedicated Ukrainian service and employs dozens of journalists in Kiev, many of whom are also active on social media in the English language. Despite this, the BBC didn’t cover the Kiev Nazi rally. And the call came on the same weekend we learned the British government has hired PR firm M&C Saatchi to run a project with the Foreign Office to “rehabilitate” Ukraine. Now if anyone thinks the two are not linked, I have a bridge to sell them.
However, if Navalny so much as breaks wind in Moscow, the BBC is there to report. Indeed, its former Moscow correspondent once ludicrously compared the Russian nationalist to Nelson Mandela.
These are the dual standards displayed by Western reporters on the Russia/Ukraine beat, and they make a mockery of supposed adherence to journalistic balance and fair play. Just this month, Moscow protests attended by around 700 people (a great many of them journalists working at the event) were given huge attention by the mainstream media, while Saturday's Kiev Nazi march was entirely ignored by the same outlets.
Ukraine has a far-right problem, and it also has a Western media predicament. Because if hacks from NATO countries think they are helping Ukraine, by turning a blind eye to this cancer, they are badly mistaken.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.